On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Already done by myself: http://bugs.librdf.org/mantis/view.php?id=441
>
> -Andy
>
Thanks.
I was wondering whether a 'soprano-noredland' package would make
sense, compiled against latest rasqal/redland. From
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipe
Already done by myself: http://bugs.librdf.org/mantis/view.php?id=441
-Andy
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Seblu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
>> Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800
>> schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
>>
>>> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
>>> > redla
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:28 PM, F. Gr. wrote:
> * Seblu [2011-04-26 09:03 +0200]:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andreas Radke
>> wrote:
>> > All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new
>> > soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor
>> > packages in
* Seblu [2011-04-26 09:03 +0200]:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andreas Radke
> wrote:
> > All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new
> > soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor
> > packages in testing.
>
> Issue is still present today.
>
> https://
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800
> schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
>
>> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem
>> > E
Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800
schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem
> > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
> >
> > redland-1.0.1
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in
> testing.
Issue is still present today.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919
Kind regards,
--
Séb
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
On Sunday 24 April 2011 23:34:41 Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
> >> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
> >> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>
>>> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
>>> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor pac
On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in
testing.
Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in
> testing.
Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland-
compat. From your m
All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in
testing.
-Andy
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2011 12:10:22 Ray Rashif wrote:
>> It would just mean we would have lone updated redland/raptor packages,
>> just so things can tango along with KDE. Otherwise, the particular KDE
>> functionality can be removed. It is up
On Sunday 24 April 2011 12:10:22 Ray Rashif wrote:
> It would just mean we would have lone updated redland/raptor packages,
> just so things can tango along with KDE. Otherwise, the particular KDE
> functionality can be removed. It is up to Andrea in that case.
The redland backend is used by kdelib
On 24 April 2011 06:17, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino
>>> wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote:
> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-co
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote:
I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with
{redland,rasqal}
On 23 April 2011 22:36, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote:
>>> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with
>>> {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and
>>> redland-compat-1.0.12
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote:
>> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with
>> {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and
>> redland-compat-1.0.12-1 that means I cannot have both at the same
>>
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:19:42 you wrote:
> I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat packages conflict with
> {redland,rasqal}. In the case of redland-1.0.13-1 and
> redland-compat-1.0.12-1 that means I cannot have both at the same
> time. Which means I have to choose between kdelibs (depends on
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> We had to add ugly compat packages because liblrdf and soprano can't be
> ported to the latest releases.
>
> Please test if anything went broken. The packages shouldn't stay long
> in testing.
>
> -Andy
I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat
22 matches
Mail list logo
