Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC, after the fact] initscripts config

2012-07-24 Thread Menachem Moystoviz
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:46:52 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote: >> > 3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going >> > to be it? >> > [1] >> > http://projects.archlin

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC, after the fact] initscripts config

2012-07-23 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:46:52 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote: > > 3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going > > to be it? > > [1] > > http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/tree/rc.conf?id=ae28554e561517815c07330b2

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC, after the fact] initscripts config

2012-07-23 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yclept Nemo wrote: > 3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going > to be it? > [1] > http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/tree/rc.conf?id=ae28554e561517815c07330b2b7d5ee5de2f6dc7 > [2] > http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC, after the fact] initscripts config

2012-07-22 Thread Yclept Nemo
3) Personally this depends on the final rc.conf, is [1] or [2] going to be it? I don't enjoy visually collating options across rc.conf (terminal #1,vim) and rc.conf(5) (terminal #2,man). So if after actions (2), and (4), nothing remains but "esoteric" options, then sure, go ahead and do whatever yo