Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.5.28-1

2010-01-12 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: > On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in >> a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll >> keep you posted. > > I gave it a try in a VM bu

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.5.28-1

2010-01-12 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote: I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll keep you posted. I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with "Failed to execute /init" like last t