On 03/20/2013 03:39 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-03-20 15:14:19 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
Deprecation of bind and dnsutils
I've just moved dnsutils to [extra] and orphaned it as well as bind.
This announcement is postponed as long as somebody can manage to keep
BIND alive...
Why not keep
[2013-03-20 15:44:35 +0100] Armin K.:
On 03/20/2013 03:39 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-03-20 15:14:19 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
Deprecation of bind and dnsutils
I've just moved dnsutils to [extra] and orphaned it as well as bind.
This announcement is postponed as long as somebody can manage
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote:
Why not keep bind9? ... It has not been abandoned upstream and I see no
conflicts between bind9 and bind10 - think gtk+2 and gtk+3 ... Both can
exist on the same system, but I doubt that two bind daemons can run at the
same
On 03/08/2013 09:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Hi guys,
Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages:
- dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools;
- bind from [extra] is the actual name server.
...
We already have ldns in [core], a much better written (and sane) DNS
library
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Genes Lists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/08/2013 09:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Hi guys,
Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages:
- dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools;
- bind from [extra] is the actual name server.
...
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:27:42 +1100
Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages:
- dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools;
- bind from [extra] is the actual name server.
With the new BIND10 release, the ISC really
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:27:42 +1100
Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi guys,
Currently we use the BIND code base in two packages:
- dnsutils from [core] provides basic DNS query tools;
- bind from [extra]
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Great. I was actually going to open a feature request for this on
flyspray.
The only thing: whouldn't one need community/unbound (unbound-host AFAIR)
to
replace nslookup?
Do I interpret this as meaning that if
[2013-03-09 21:37:01 +] Mike Cloaked:
Apologies for replying to my own previous post, but having read up a little
more about authoritative and caching/recursive namerservers - it seems that
a good alternative to bind (which I use on all my machines especially as a
local authoritative DNS
[2013-03-09 09:51:38 -0500] Genes Lists:
One observation - bind is the de facto standard and as far as I can
tell used by the majority of the root servers [1] (and the majority of all
major DNS servers according to wikipedia [2] and bind website [3] anyway
:-)).
We may want to
On 03/09/2013 06:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
It is really beyond me why you would state your uninformed opinion
having not read anything about the benefits of ldns+unbound+nsd when
Sorry - i missed the nsd reference in your original mail. Mea culpa.
nsd indeed is interesting and solid.
11 matches
Mail list logo
