Am Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:18:32 -0500
schrieb Loui Chang :
> Rp-pppoe doesn't need to stay in base to remain in core though. It
> should be available to install via CD-ROM if it's in core.
Can the rp-pppoe scripts also be run from the LiveCD's shell before
starting the installation if it's not in ba
On Sun 28 Feb 2010 01:59 +0530, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> rp-pppoe should not be removed, Its very handy and easy to use tool.
> It was using it this tool I was able to connect the internet in
> ArchLinux. without it I won't be able to install arch. the alternative
> ppp is hard to configure.
Rp-ppp
Hi,
rp-pppoe should not be removed, Its very handy and easy to use tool.
It was using it this tool I was able to connect the internet in
ArchLinux. without it I won't be able to install arch. the alternative
ppp is hard to configure.
I am strongly against this, would recommend not touching rp-pppo
(Forked from arch-dev-public)
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:40:27 +0200, Roman Kyrylych
wrote:
> The following packages are questionable:
> * diffutils - why it should be on every system?
> * gawk - why it should be on every system?
> [...]
> * mailx
> [...]
> * vi - ok, no bikeshed thing here, but the
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:03, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 26/02/10 22:31, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> Am 26.02.2010 10:28, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will post
>>> again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds wi
Am 26.02.2010 14:01, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:36 +0100
> schrieb Thomas Bächler :
>
>> We don't need rp-pppoe in base (IMO not even in core, but others
>> disagree).
>
> I disagree because configuring a pppoe client with pure ppp is far too
> complicated. For people who ha
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:36 +0100
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> We don't need rp-pppoe in base (IMO not even in core, but others
> disagree).
I disagree because configuring a pppoe client with pure ppp is far too
complicated. For people who haven't got a router and establish their
DSL connections d
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:28:46 +0100
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> bsdtar can be used for that purpose.
Didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
Greetings,
Heiko
Am 26.02.2010 13:23, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> cpio is probably not necessarily needed by the average user, but as far
> as I know it's needed to uncompress or read the content of the initrd
> (e.g. xzcat kernel26.img | cpio -t), which sometimes can be necessary
> for debugging purposes. So I'm not su
On 26/02/10 22:23, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:28:24 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae:
I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will
post again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds
will start hitting [testing].
FS#12890 suggests cleaning some of the
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:23:16 +0100
schrieb Heiko Baums :
> And cryptsetup definitely needs to stay in [core] and in the base
> group because this is needed for encrypting hard disks, which is
> supported by AIF anyway. And cryptsetup is needed at boot time and
> during the installation from the Li
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:28:24 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will
> post again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds
> will start hitting [testing].
>
> FS#12890 suggests cleaning some of the packages from the base group.
12 matches
Mail list logo
