On 30/04/11 08:47, Dan McGee wrote:
The correct solution to me would be:
1. add another custom tablesort ordering; see archweb.js for our
current listing of them.
http://projects.archlinux.org/archweb.git/tree/media/archweb.js#n5
2. Make the attribute template tag itself smarter and always
On 30 April 2011 04:26, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2- The report for large packages should list the sizes in MB instead of
bytes.
That would make the generic nature of these reports a lot harder,
and/or
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2011 04:26, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2- The report for large packages should list the sizes in MB instead of
3 matches
Mail list logo
