Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 12:31:19 schrieb Allan McRae:
> Overall, I'd prefer to spend my time getting pkg deltas working which I
> think is the better bandwagon to jump on...
Sure deltas are quite usefull, too. OT: The recent approach is to
automatically generate them within repo-add, right? So
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
I am just doing some very simple test right now. (default compression
preset)
core (x86_64)(decompress time)
none552M
gzip186M12s
xz121M17s
I will add a test for extra later.
Even though this might not
Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 12:02:22 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Anyone else in favor of moving to lzma? Related: lzma-compressed kernel
> (support with 2.6.30 and newer), maybe lzma-compressed squashfs on the
> live CDs (2.6.30 has lzma support, no idea if squashfs can use it already).
I think we cou
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
I am just doing some very simple test right now. (default compression preset)
core (x86_64) (decompress time)
none552M
gzip186M12s
xz 121M17s
I will add a test for extra later.
Even though this might not be
Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 08:37:58 schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:03:43AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 02:06:31 schrieb Dan McGee:
> > > Yes, of course. I think we can take some time to let it bake, as there
> > > is not an immediate need, and
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:03:43AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 02:06:31 schrieb Dan McGee:
> > Yes, of course. I think we can take some time to let it bake, as there
> > is not an immediate need, and when 5.0 comes out we can move it to
> > core and then rebuild libarch
6 matches
Mail list logo
