On 05/19/2010 07:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 20.05.2010 00:49, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
Does anyone know what the point of that radeon hook in the AUR is then?
All it does is add the radeon module and include the "radeon" firmware
files - which I see are listed by 'modinfo radeon' anyway.
Am 20.05.2010 00:49, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
> Does anyone know what the point of that radeon hook in the AUR is then?
> All it does is add the radeon module and include the "radeon" firmware
> files - which I see are listed by 'modinfo radeon' anyway.
>
It has no point at all.
signature.asc
D
On 05/19/2010 06:40 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 20.05.2010 00:30, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
Maybe this is a little premature, or altogether irrelevant, but now that
we're reorganizing all of the firmware what can we expect in terms of
its inclusion in the initcpio?
Is there a direct relationship
Am 20.05.2010 00:30, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
> Maybe this is a little premature, or altogether irrelevant, but now that
> we're reorganizing all of the firmware what can we expect in terms of
> its inclusion in the initcpio?
>
> Is there a direct relationship between modules and firmware so that j
On 05/19/2010 05:39 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
As a followup to a discussion on [arch-general] in the Linux 2.6.34
thread ([1] and others), I think we should do the following:
- Create a linux-firmware package from the linux-firmware.git tree.
- Make that package conflict and replace all other fi
5 matches
Mail list logo
