Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-23 Thread Attila
At Dienstag, 22. Dezember 2009 12:59 Andreas Radke wrote: > We would also like to do this. Would mean much less work for us. i can understand this reason but please don't forget if something goes wrong than everybody includes you have more work as with seperate *-git packages. > Sadly not all p

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-23 Thread Heiko Baums
Writing again to arch-general because of write permissions. Am Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:21:03 +0100 schrieb Andreas Radke : > The sad part is that we leave all people with modern Ati cards in the > dark until upstream declares their code as stable. This will make them > going back to software rasteriz

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-22 Thread Ionut Biru
On 12/22/2009 01:59 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: Am Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:29 +0100 schrieb Heiko Baums: Please, don't make too many experiments in the stable repos and keep the packages in the repos as close to the "stable" upstream releases as possible. I don't think that having a git version in

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-22 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:29 +0100 schrieb Heiko Baums : > Please, don't make too many experiments in the stable repos and keep > the packages in the repos as close to the "stable" upstream releases > as possible. I don't think that having a git version in the repo is a > good idea anyway. We wou

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-21 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:17:23 +0200 schrieb nez...@allurelinux.org: > IMHO, Encouraging people to dasable KMS on official packages is more > sane for now. Those who need the latest and greatest should do it on > their own. > > (1) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33016 Please, don't make

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-21 Thread Nezmer
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:35:12PM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote: > > libdrm has been updated to 2.4.17 - this is breaking all radeon 3d > stuff and will require changes in MESA when I understand the > upstream devs right. Mesa7.7 is expected in a few days anyways and > should make Radeon 3d stuff wo