On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh huh... well the end users can just ask the package maintainer to see
what they can do. Just one email. No bug reports and the attendant extra
work those usually involve. i.e. Simple and usually exceptionally
effective for an
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blah blah blah
I have one simple policy for you :
send your freaking desktop file upstream
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blah blah blah
I am thrilled you liked it so much !!
I have one simple policy for you :
send your freaking desktop file upstream
As you already know; I have previously said I do just that.
And thank you for simplifying your
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh huh... well the end users can just ask the package maintainer to
see what they can do. Just one email. No bug reports and the
attendant extra work those usually involve. i.e. Simple and usually
exceptionally effective for an
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why ?, well there is no reason NOT to have one in such circumstances,
and often the upstream guys are expecting the downstream packagers to
supply it. - And that's o.k. with me.
That's not alright. Anything that causes useless and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It entails NO 'duplicated work' for me to supply a .desktop file when one
is not extent. And my supplying it is not 'useless' (work) either. (And
since I work from a template, it is also simple.)
Um, your policy steps above sure seems to be a lot more steps than just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It entails NO 'duplicated work' for me to supply a .desktop file when
one is not extent. And my supplying it is not 'useless' (work) either.
(And since I work from a template, it is also simple.)
Um, your policy steps above sure seems to be a lot more steps than
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why ?, well there is no reason NOT to have one in such circumstances, and
often the upstream guys are expecting the downstream packagers to supply
it. - And that's o.k. with me.
That's not alright. Anything that causes useless and
Hi,
Xavier wrote:
Hopefully this should reduce the load of arch packagers and move it to
arch community and upstream.
There is also the situation that upstream may not provide a .desktop
file on the basis of:
1) The belief that distributions should decide which menu the item
should appear
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i wanted to note that there is
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo
a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream.
Instead it says I (bardo) will write/modify the
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i wanted to note that there is
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project maintained by bardo
a TU, which mentions absolutely nothing about upstream.
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, i wanted to note that there is
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Desktop_Project
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, i wanted to note
On Thu 2008-05-08 10:06 , Ryan Sims wrote:
We needn't get bogged down in another is this the ARCH WAY?!?!
conversation here;
I swear I don't want to.
I don't think it needs to be a policy decision. If
neither Arch nor upstream want to deal with .desktop files (and they
both seem to have
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:53:29PM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2008 15:58:51 bardo wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i wanted to note
15 matches
Mail list logo
