Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-07-06 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 07/06/2012 03:31 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > bump, > > i really want to move this list as soon as possible to testing. > what's the status of amarok and miro? > what about the other packages that weren't compatible? did you guys > switched to ffmpeg-compat? > > I say we kick miro and apparently ama

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-21 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 21.06.2012 11:17, schrieb Sergej Pupykin: > > At Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:52:18 +0300, > Ionut Biru wrote: >> why did you bother to ask us for opinions if you don't even wait to see >> what we have to say. > > Because of I can remove it. Putting package into staging is not too > fatal action) Agre

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-21 Thread Sergej Pupykin
At Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:52:18 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: > why did you bother to ask us for opinions if you don't even wait to see > what we have to say. Because of I can remove it. Putting package into staging is not too fatal action)

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-20 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
Ionut Biru wrote: On 06/20/2012 06:40 PM, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > At Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:13:13 +0400, > Sergej Pupykin wrote: >> >> What do you think about ffmpeg-compat package ? > > I've put it to community-staging and build motion, synfig and > openscenegraph packages with it. > why did yo

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-20 Thread Ionut Biru
On 06/20/2012 06:40 PM, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > At Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:13:13 +0400, > Sergej Pupykin wrote: >> >> What do you think about ffmpeg-compat package ? > > I've put it to community-staging and build motion, synfig and > openscenegraph packages with it. > why did you bother to ask us f

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-20 Thread Sergej Pupykin
At Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:13:13 +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > > What do you think about ffmpeg-compat package ? I've put it to community-staging and build motion, synfig and openscenegraph packages with it.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-20 Thread Sergej Pupykin
What do you think about ffmpeg-compat package ? # $Id$ pkgname=ffmpeg-compat pkgver=20120509 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Complete and free Internet live audio and video broadcasting solution for Linux/Unix" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://ffmpeg.org/"; license=('GPL') depends=(als

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-09 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Hello, I've added a "source" compatibility report generated by the ABI Compliance Checker tool here to be used along with the mentioned "binary" compatibility report: http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/ffmpeg/0.10.3_to_0.11/src_compat_report.html combined report: http://upstream-track

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] x264 and ffmpeg rebuild

2012-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 07/06/12 21:36, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 06/03/2012 06:52 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just pushed in staging new updates for this two packages. We are doing >>> this two in the same time. >>> >>> >> >> bump. >> >> there are still