On 2014-04-08 22:27, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
Hello all,
With the arrival of ghc 7.8.1 [0], I would like to address the following
problems with a restructuring of how we treat haskell packages in archlinux:
Problem 1: Updating any haskell package has been delayed until we bump ghc.
On 2014-04-09 09:07, Magnus Therning wrote:
Change 2: Make a news item stating that cabal-install is now the
recommended way to install haskell packages. This wouldn't pollute the
filesystem since cabal-install installs packages to the ~/.cabal directory
by default. We might need to include a
On 2014-04-10 06:39, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell
group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages
officially instead?
I wouldn't actually
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:34:00PM +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
On 2014-04-09 09:07, Magnus Therning wrote:
Change 2: Make a news item stating that cabal-install is now the
recommended way to install haskell packages. This wouldn't pollute
the filesystem since cabal-install installs packages
Tom,
I might come across as very critical below, but I'm really not. As
you probably realise I've also thought a bit about related questions
and I'm just really interested in your thoughts and answers.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
With
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
Tom,
I might come across as very critical below, but I'm really not. As
you probably realise I've also thought a bit about related questions
and I'm just really interested in your thoughts and answers.
On Wed, Apr
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside
of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right?
That would be correct.
Is the plan then that any future tools (i.e. non-libraries)
7 matches
Mail list logo
