On 08/05/2012 06:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2012 6:04 AM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
>>> I've rebooted and confirmed the udev rule I found does not resolve the
>>> issue. I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'
On Aug 5, 2012 6:04 AM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jackson Alley
wrote:
> >
> > I've rebooted and confirmed the udev rule I found does not resolve the
> > issue. I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
> > a root btrfs system but rath
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jackson Alley wrote:
>
> I've rebooted and confirmed the udev rule I found does not resolve the
> issue. I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscri
On 08/04/2012 07:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
>> I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
>> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
>> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=13ca7f028a
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jackson Alley wrote:
> I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=13ca7f028ac775773a6685966d0faeee5cc55a9d).
Yeah, this is due t
On 08/03/2012 09:11 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012 7:56 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley"
> wrote:
On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jac
On Aug 3, 2012 7:56 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley"
wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley <
toomanymirr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
I've got
On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
wrote:
> >> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
> >> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc
On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
>> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
>> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc/init
>> layout.
> Could you give more info. What exact
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley wrote:
> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc/init
> layout.
Could you give more info. What exactly fails? What is the output?
> I found this, but hav
On 07/27/2012 03:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
>
> In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses btrf
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Unf
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Jameson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>>> wrote:
Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, u
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
>>> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
>>
Hi,
I installed btrfs-progs from testing and regenerated the image
using mkinitcpio. It works fine and my btrfs volume is still being
mounted correctly. I use systemd though and don't have any multi
device btrfs volume either.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 07/27/2
On 07/27/2012 01:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
>
> In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses bt
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Jameson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
>> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
>
> I have a multi-device volume, but I'm running systemd. I c
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Unfortunately none of my computers have multi-device btrfs now, used
> to have one for testing a couple of years ago
I have a multi-device volume, but I'm running systemd. I can validate
that btrfs-progs in testing didn't break my vo
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
I use btrfs for 3 years now the last 2 is my root and h
Hi guys,
Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
the package appears to work).
In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses btrfs-progs
and initscripts from testing could verify that th
21 matches
Mail list logo
