Re: [arch-general] [signoff] dmraid-1.0.0rc16-3

2010-03-18 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 18.03.2010 19:31, schrieb Xavier Chantry: > Tobias, did you receive the last mail from dmraid developer ? > It seems we can solve this problem in a better way now with just a > runtime option. And keep just the dynamic binary. > I will see if I can get that running and working. > > Or do you st

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] dmraid-1.0.0rc16-3

2010-03-18 Thread Xavier Chantry
Tobias, did you receive the last mail from dmraid developer ? It seems we can solve this problem in a better way now with just a runtime option. And keep just the dynamic binary. I will see if I can get that running and working. Or do you still want to temporarily re-add static dmraid despites tha

[arch-general] [signoff] dmraid-1.0.0rc16-3

2010-03-18 Thread Tobias Powalowski
HI, readded static dmraid again to fix: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18348 please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa