Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/21/2010 01:31 PM, Byron Clark wrote: > > I'm guessing that none of those were broken because of the kernel > update, but because of the unfinished libpng rebuild in testing. > 100% Correct. The issues were libpng12 to libpng14 and libjpg. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PL

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-21 Thread Byron Clark
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:19:44PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/20/2010 01:44 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > > packages for e17 wasn't rebuild. have patience or downgrade to > > extra/community and don't flood the email with useless problems. > > > > The rebuilding process is NOT FINISHED. > >

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-21 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/20/2010 01:44 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: > packages for e17 wasn't rebuild. have patience or downgrade to > extra/community and don't flood the email with useless problems. > > The rebuilding process is NOT FINISHED. Sorry, those weren't complaints... Since I have blackbox, e16, e17, fluxbox, fv

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-21 Thread Mauro Santos
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox >>> >>> even with 2.6.32.3, I had to recomile virtualbox module. I tried to start >>> a VM and system froze solid and had to do h

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4 -1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Thursday 21 January 2010 00:50:22 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: > >> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two b

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/20/2010 09:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using W

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Tobias, all, > > After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: > > (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker > (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox > > It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the ke

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/20/2010 09:21 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote: On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills Virtual

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote: > On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: >> >> Tobias, all, >> >> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: >> >> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker >> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox >> >> It was ironic, becaus

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: >> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: >> >> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker >> (2) the kerne

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote: Tobias, all, After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs: > > (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker > (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox even with 2.6.32.3, I had to

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread David Rosenstrauch
On 01/20/2010 11:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel Just a suggestion: I usually drop down to single user ("sudo telinit s") before I install major packages like a kernel. DR

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:51 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> bump to latest bugfix version. > >> Please signoff both arches, > >> > >> greetings > >> tpowa > > > > Can't 'sign off'

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.4-1 [ Possible Problems... ]

2010-01-20 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >> Hi guys, >> bump to latest bugfix version. >> Please signoff both arches, >> >> greetings >> tpowa > > Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64 > with nvidia. I'