Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-10-03 Thread Damjan Georgievski
I think tpowa had the kernel all ready to move to core, except he was waiting for the .1 release, which is there now. The only thing bugging me is http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16149, opinions? Just be aware of this problem http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=627145 This Arch user

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-29 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 26 September 2009 04:21:45 am Thomas Bächler wrote: Kernel is in testing for both architectures, please sign off (at least one for x86_64, two for i686). I think tpowa had the kernel all ready to move to core, except he was waiting for the .1 release, which is there now. The

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-28 Thread Damjan Georgievski
Kernel is in testing for both architectures, please sign off (at least one for x86_64, two for i686). I think tpowa had the kernel all ready to move to core, except he was waiting for the .1 release, which is there now. The only thing bugging me is http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16149,

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Damjan Georgievski schrieb: Just be aware of this problem http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=627145 This Arch user lost /dev/tty0,1,2,3 device nodes on boot with 2.6.31 from the Arch testing repositry. A friend of mine also had the same issue with a self compiled 2.6.31. On my laptop

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-28 Thread Damjan Georgievski
Just be aware of this problem http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=627145 This Arch user lost /dev/tty0,1,2,3 device nodes on boot with 2.6.31 from the Arch testing repositry. A friend of mine also had the same issue with a self compiled 2.6.31. On my laptop the same config works

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-28 Thread Damjan Georgievski
The problem is mentioned here too http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/24/444 but there hasn't been any response. I was unaware of this, as there is no bug report assigned to me about it. Does this also happen with 2.6.31.1? yes there's a bit of discussion here... but, afaik, the patch linked after

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.31.1-1

2009-09-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Kernel is in testing for both architectures, please sign off (at least one for x86_64, two for i686). I think tpowa had the kernel all ready to move to core, except he was waiting for the .1 release, which is there now. The only thing bugging me is http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16149,