Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-07 Thread Guillermo Leira
> On 08/02/2011 09:19 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > >> > > I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2. > > Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again. > > > > Everything else seems to work fine. > > > > Best Rega

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 08/02/11 12:52, C Anthony Risinger wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Archlinux Changes: > - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux > - Added replaces everywhere > - Removed old comments an

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
2011/8/2 Lukáš Jirkovský : >> Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing: >> - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux >> - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img >>  same for fallback of course. >> > > Why not use only > - kernel name: vmlinuz > - initramfs name: initramfs.img > and for fallback > - kernel

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
> Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing: > - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux > - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img >  same for fallback of course. > Why not use only - kernel name: vmlinuz - initramfs name: initramfs.img and for fallback - kernel name: vmlinuz-fallback - initramfs name: in

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Kwpolska
On Aug 2, 2011 6:39 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > > > > Upstream > > changes: > > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > > > Archlinux Changes: > > - Rename the packag

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> meh whatever :-)  i guess i don't really care anyway since i would >> never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for >> the split originally ... though that

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > meh whatever :-)  i guess i don't really care anyway since i would > never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for > the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now > (providing said reason even exi

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vic Demuzere wrote: > On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger > wrote: >> >> >> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for ha

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Vic Demuzere
On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> > >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` > >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (f

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't >> around then) how is this handled wit

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` > package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't > around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package?  or is this > a non-issue? We no longer

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Archlinux Changes: > - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux > - Added replaces everywhere > - Removed old comments an

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 08/02/2011 09:19 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2. Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again. Everything else seems to work fine. Best Regards, Guillermo Leira Probably s

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-02 Thread Guillermo Leira
> Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2. Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again. Everything else seems to work fine. Best Regards, Guillermo Leira

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/8/1 Tobias Powalowski : > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Archlinux Changes: > - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux > - Added replaces everywhere > - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. Signoff both.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
On 2011/8/1 Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. Using that for some days, signof i686. -- Rémy.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Tobias Powalowski
No discussion here it's been decided! > - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux > - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img > same for fallback of course. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Descr

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. signoff x86_64 -t

[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0-2

2011-08-01 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys, please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Archlinux Changes: - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux - Added replaces everywhere - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file - Removed old comments and replaces from PKGBUILD