On 10/11/2011 01:22 PM, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
Try update this package with "--force" key, probably your previous update was
not properly finished. Anyway it will not be a big problem because kernel source
doesn't make any influence on working system.
Thanks Roman,
I cheated:
12:55 archangel:
11.10.2011 21:59, David C. Rankin пишет:
On 10/07/2011 07:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
- fixed archiso support
- revert to performance governor
please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
I get the following error on one x86_64 box, others have updated fine -
d
On 10/07/2011 07:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
- fixed archiso support
- revert to performance governor
please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
I get the following error on one x86_64 box, others have updated fine - don't
know why?
(65/65) checking for fil
Am 09.10.2011 07:43, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Could you point me to some more info about this (I couldn't find any
>> bug reports)? I'm interested in following up on it so we can one day
>> move to ondemand by default. For what it's worth, fedora and opensuse
>> have been using ondemand for so
> Could you point me to some more info about this (I couldn't find any
> bug reports)? I'm interested in following up on it so we can one day
> move to ondemand by default. For what it's worth, fedora and opensuse
> have been using ondemand for some time. Is it known why we are seeing
> problems an
> There are also differences in the two configs caused by
> http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/linux&id=d7ad85513496578dc9e8dbfa87fac8e0db9e490e
>
Thanks corrected this.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 07.10.2011 22:16, schrieb Matthew Gyurgyik:
>> On 10/07/2011 08:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>>> - fixed archiso support
>>> - revert to performance governor
>>
>> Looked in the tracker and didn't see an
Am Freitag, den 07.10.2011, 14:26 +0200 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> - fixed archiso support
> - revert to performance governor
>
> please signoff both arches,
> greetings
> tpowa
The i686-config in SVN seems wrong to me. It has performance governor as
module and ond
Am 07.10.2011 22:16, schrieb Matthew Gyurgyik:
> On 10/07/2011 08:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>> - fixed archiso support
>> - revert to performance governor
>>
>> please signoff both arches,
>> greetings
>> tpowa
> Looked in the tracker and didn't see anything. J
On 10/07/2011 08:26 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
- fixed archiso support
- revert to performance governor
please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
Looked in the tracker and didn't see anything. Just curious, why are we
reverting back to the performance governor?
Latest kernel is in testing,
- fixed archiso support
- revert to performance governor
please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
11 matches
Mail list logo