Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-24 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/24/2011 06:38 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > OK, > > That's good info, but why then does Fluxbox exhibit the same pixelation > desktop crash when an xterm is launched? > > I can start fluxbox and I can look at the menus (change config settings in > the > menu), but as soon as I launch an

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-24 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/24/2011 01:17 PM, Wieland Hoffmann wrote: I have no idea what this error is. Something is going wrong somewhere on > x86_64 with either glibc or libxcb. I don't know if the output from the startx > command and its backtrace will help narrow this down, but it seems to be a > generic X

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-24 Thread Wieland Hoffmann
On 24.02.2011 19:10, David C. Rankin wrote: > > COP: unregister 'kaccess' > X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3 > Major opcode: 7 > Minor opcode: 0 > Resource id: 0x206 > X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3 > Major opcode: 6 > Minor opcode: 0 > Resource

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-24 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/23/2011 08:37 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/23/2011 07:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 24/02/11 10:15, David C. Rankin wrote: >>> On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining about corruption?

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread Attila
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:38:42 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: > If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm. If you want to do this than this can save your time: http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/convert-virtualbox-vdi-to-kvm-qcow Personally i would use qed with the new qemu-kmv 0.14.0 instead of q

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/23/2011 07:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 24/02/11 10:15, David C. Rankin wrote: >> On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: >>> I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining >>> about corruption? >>> >>> #8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread Allan McRae
On 24/02/11 10:15, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining about corruption? #8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x7f3550dd6a2e "malloc(): memory corruption", ptr=) at

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining > about corruption? > > #8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x7f3550dd6a2e > "malloc(): memory corruption", ptr=) at malloc.c:6283 > #9 0x7f3550d2

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/23/2011 01:38 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/22/2011 06:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was also >> the >> only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, there are other >> distros using that patch without report

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/22/2011 06:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was also the > only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, there are other > distros using that patch without reported issue and it is now in glibc > mainline > so nothing

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread Baho Utot
On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 07:41:53 PM Allan McRae wrote: > > That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was > also the only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, > there are other distros using that patch without reported issue and it > is now in glibc m

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread Allan McRae
On 23/02/11 10:13, David C. Rankin wrote: On 02/22/2011 05:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 23/02/11 04:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:41:12AM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On next reboot/restart, I got the kdesktop.kcrash (attached). So then I downgraded glibc (2.13-4 -

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/22/2011 05:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 23/02/11 04:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:41:12AM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: >>>On next reboot/restart, I got the kdesktop.kcrash (attached). So then I >>> downgraded glibc (2.13-4 -> 2.13-3), restarted Trinity -> p

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread Allan McRae
On 23/02/11 04:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:41:12AM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: On next reboot/restart, I got the kdesktop.kcrash (attached). So then I downgraded glibc (2.13-4 -> 2.13-3), restarted Trinity -> perfect No kdesktop,kcrash. It looks like this is a gl

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/22/2011 11:41 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > Guys, > > The problem is glibc-2.13-4. I have about 5 Arch/Trinity Virtualbox VMs. On > one I had not updated, I started Trinity x86_64 and there was NO kdesktop > crash. > I then proceeded to update the VM to the current Arch packages whic

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/22/2011 12:23 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > No, seriously... glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc > branch that is not included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with > prelink [1]. Obviously, this has some side effects. Seems like it > requires some more investigation. > >

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/22/2011 12:23 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Allan broke it! > > No, seriously... glibc 2.13-4 introduced a patch from the Fedora glibc > branch that is not included in mainline glibc and fixes issues with > prelink [1]. Obviously, this has some side effects. Seems like it > requires some more

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:41:12AM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On next reboot/restart, I got the kdesktop.kcrash (attached). So then I > downgraded glibc (2.13-4 -> 2.13-3), restarted Trinity -> perfect No > kdesktop,kcrash. It looks like this is a glibc issue, so I'll follow up > (below) >

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-22 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/21/2011 08:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/21/2011 05:09 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >> uff i reading this >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/2010-March/005818.html and >> seem like that! >> >> any help fron anybody here! >> > > I'll follow up there. I can't believe that an