On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
>
> Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> without an -lts kernel until recently.
this applies to technology in general -- we don't need any of it, but
forward we move nonetheless.
> IMHO it is a lot more advisab
On Friday, June 10, 2011 23:36:18 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
>
> wrote:
> > Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> > without an -lts kernel until recently.
>
> this applies to technology in general -- we don't need any
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Friday, June 10, 2011 23:36:18 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> > > without an -lts kernel until recentl
Excerpts from Timothy L.'s message of 2011-06-13 15:10:16 -0400:
> ...
> I'm a novice when it comes to this kind of stuff, but adding
> simple hooks doesn't seem to needlessly complicate a user's
> system. It's something a user would never notice unless they
> actually needed to use the functionali
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, David Campbell wrote:
> Excerpts from Timothy L.'s message of 2011-06-13 15:10:16 -0400:
> > ...
> > I'm a novice when it comes to this kind of stuff, but adding
> > simple hooks doesn't seem to needlessly complicate a user's
> > system. It's something a user would
On Monday 13 June 2011 20:53:19 David Campbell wrote:
> Excerpts from Timothy L.'s message of 2011-06-13 15:10:16 -0400:
> > ...
> > I'm a novice when it comes to this kind of stuff, but adding
> > simple hooks doesn't seem to needlessly complicate a user's
> > system. It's something a user would n
6 matches
Mail list logo
