[arch-general] Re: systemd native files in etc

2012-08-24 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 24/08/12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > My understanding is that the conf file locations (and contents) are > synchronized between distros. A side-effect of systemd. Hence I don't > believe Arch is upstream in this case. AFAIK, systemd does not provide samples for /etc/localtime, /etc/vconsole.conf, etc

[arch-general] Re: systemd native files in etc

2012-08-24 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 24/08/12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > If the files are provided in linked packages to their functionality, > there'd be a new .pacnew everytime the linked package was updated. I have no idea what you are talking about, sorry. Packages have dependencies to other packages and I don't know how a package

[arch-general] Re: systemd native files in etc

2012-08-24 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 23/08/12, Ike Devolder wrote: > No there is no package providing those files. > > why ? > > if arch would provide you with defaults every time the defaults get updated > you would get *.pacnew files in your etc. since those files are depending on > your system and are user choice it would