On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:43:58 +0100
Dennis Börm allsp...@planetcyborg.de wrote:
we're using
http://joey.kitenet.net/code/etckeeper/
for that purpose
I see it's available via AUR, but, afaik, it does not support Arch's
pacman due to lack of hook support in Pacman.
Can you share some light
I wrote a system backup program called mime that works similar to Apple's
Time Machine on the back end. Basically each time you backup your system,
another copy of your file system is available. Another program is
installed with it called lsmime which is used to list, restore and view
On 06/20/2012 07:46 AM, Squall Lionheart wrote:
I wrote a system backup program called mime that works similar to Apple's
Time Machine on the back end. Basically each time you backup your system,
another copy of your file system is available. Another program is
installed with it called lsmime
Squall, very nice work going to give this a shot later today on a test box.
Thanks for pointing this out. I tried a few things in suggestions to my OP
but this seems to be the best so far. Thanks for bringing this back up
Your welcome. I will post a message to everyone when I roll out my next
On 06/20/12 at 09:28am, Squall Lionheart wrote:
Your welcome. I will post a message to everyone when I roll out my next
version since it's a huge improvement over the current one with a lot of
very powerful and user friendly features, as well as efficiency
improvements.
It'd be nice if you
It'd be nice if you added it to the AUR.
M
After I roll out this update, that's on my list of stuff to figure out :).
I have never created an AUR package, doesn't sound to difficult.
Squall
--
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift.
That's why its called the present.
On 02/22/2012 11:48 PM, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Hello Don,
Excerpts from Don deJuan's message of Thu Feb 23 07:35:52 +0100 2012:
What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
my config history at
Le jeudi 23 février 2012 à 08:48 +0100, Alfredo Palhares a écrit :
Hello Don,
You create a bare repo:
$ mkdir etc.git
$ git init --bare
Now lets congigure it to chek the files elsewhere:
$ git config core.worktree /etc
And export these vars to you current session
$ export
On 02/23/2012 12:48 AM, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Hello Don,
Excerpts from Don deJuan's message of Thu Feb 23 07:35:52 +0100 2012:
What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
my config
Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of Thu Feb 23 17:08:46 +0100 2012:
What about permissions and ownership? These are pretty important for /etc.
What about those ? Git doesn't care about permissions, the only permissions
that git
stores is the executable bit.
--
Regards,
Alfredo Palhares
Alfredo Palhares, Thu 2012-02-23 @ 17:24:01+0100:
Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of Thu Feb 23 17:08:46 +0100
2012:
What about permissions and ownership? These are pretty important for
/etc.
What about those ? Git doesn't care about permissions, the only
permissions that git stores
On 02/23/2012 05:36 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Alfredo Palhares, Thu 2012-02-23 @ 17:24:01+0100:
Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of Thu Feb 23 17:08:46 +0100
2012:
What about permissions and ownership? These are pretty important for
/etc.
What about those ? Git doesn't care about
Excerpts from Taylor Hedberg's message of Thu Feb 23 17:36:00 +0100 2012:
But that's problematic for files in /etc, many of which require specific
ownership or mode bits set/unset. You don't want your VCS to elide the
fact that /etc/shadow should only be readable by root, for instance.
I
On 02/23/2012 08:56 AM, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Excerpts from Taylor Hedberg's message of Thu Feb 23 17:36:00 +0100 2012:
But that's problematic for files in /etc, many of which require specific
ownership or mode bits set/unset. You don't want your VCS to elide the
fact that /etc/shadow should
On 02/23/2012 08:43 AM, Dennis Börm wrote:
On 02/23/2012 05:36 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
Alfredo Palhares, Thu 2012-02-23 @ 17:24:01+0100:
Excerpts from Matthew Monaco's message of Thu Feb 23 17:08:46 +0100
2012:
What about permissions and ownership? These are pretty important for
/etc.
What
What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
my config history at the minimum.
I have seen the package etckeeper and it does not seem to really fully
be setup to work with pacman. Both AUR
Hello Don,
Excerpts from Don deJuan's message of Thu Feb 23 07:35:52 +0100 2012:
What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
my config history at the minimum.
I too keep my /etc directory
17 matches
Mail list logo
