Re: [arch-general] 2.6.28 to core?

2009-01-19 Thread Geoffroy Carrier
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:23, Gerhard Brauer gerhard.bra...@web.de wrote: Ok, that's something the virtualbox-ose maintainer have to deal with. We could put this info in a announce mail for those users which have to build their modules locally, before the community-package gets updated. AFAIK

Re: [arch-general] 2.6.28 to core?

2009-01-15 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Am Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:52:45 +0100 schrieb Gerhard Brauer gerhard.bra...@web.de: seems that all stopper for 2.6.28 are solved. Are there any issues that causes 2.6.28 (and klibc, mkinitcpio) don't went to [core]? Without these the new ISO's couldn't be build... Back to topic: Could any of the

Re: [arch-general] 2.6.28 to core?

2009-01-14 Thread wain
Hello, Virtualbox modules can't be compiled anymore with 2.6.28. wain - Original Message - From: Gerhard Brauer gerhard.bra...@web.de Sent: Wed, January 14, 2009 10:52 Subject:[arch-general] 2.6.28 to core? Hello, seems that all stopper for 2.6.28 are solved. Are there any issues

Re: [arch-general] 2.6.28 to core?

2009-01-14 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/1/14 wain w...@archlinux.fr: Hello, Virtualbox modules can't be compiled anymore with 2.6.28. Virtualbox isn't the cause because kernel2.6.28 isn't in [core]. Btw, there is a bug report[1] solved for build virtualbox under 2.6.28. [1] http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/2936 -- Andrea

Re: [arch-general] 2.6.28 to core?

2009-01-14 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Am Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:38:25 +0100 schrieb Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org: 2009/1/14 wain w...@archlinux.fr: Hello, Virtualbox modules can't be compiled anymore with 2.6.28. Virtualbox isn't the cause because kernel2.6.28 isn't in [core]. Btw, there is a bug report[1] solved for