Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
The amarok-svn and amarok2-svn are packaging the same. And even if one of them would package svn version of amarok 1 it would not be necessary because the Amarok 1.x development was discontinued and thus amarok1 package is the only necessary for Amarok 1.4. 2009/7/3 Stefan Husmann : > Manne Merak

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Stefan Husmann
Manne Merak schrieb: Will Siddall wrote: Each of these packages are for a different purpose. Obviously amarok-svn is to download the latest amarok from subversion, amarok2-svn is so people get the latest build of amarok2 from subversion and amarok1 would be for those people who want the 1.4.10

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Cedric Staniewski
Will Siddall wrote: > as the version numbers show, amarok-svn is for amarok1 while > amarok2-svn is... well, you know. That's not right. Actually, both packages build a svn version of amarok2.

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Will Siddall
as the version numbers show, amarok-svn is for amarok1 while amarok2-svn is... well, you know. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Manne Merak wrote: > Will Siddall wrote: >> >> Each of these packages are for a different purpose. Obviously >> amarok-svn is to download the latest amarok from subversio

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Manne Merak
Will Siddall wrote: Each of these packages are for a different purpose. Obviously amarok-svn is to download the latest amarok from subversion, amarok2-svn is so people get the latest build of amarok2 from subversion and amarok1 would be for those people who want the 1.4.10 build of amarok becaus

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Will Siddall
Each of these packages are for a different purpose. Obviously amarok-svn is to download the latest amarok from subversion, amarok2-svn is so people get the latest build of amarok2 from subversion and amarok1 would be for those people who want the 1.4.10 build of amarok because they are reluctant t

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Manne Merak
hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:59:51 +0300 Biru Ionut wrote: hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? check last updated date? For example, there is amarok

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:59:51 +0300 Biru Ionut wrote: > hollun...@gmx.at wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 > > Manne Merak wrote: > > > >> Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? > >> check last updated date? > >> For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Biru Ionut
hollun...@gmx.at wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? check last updated date? For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok2-svn, but amarok2-svn was last updated in beginning of Jun, amarok-svn yesterda

Re: [arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread hollunder
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:49:16 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: > Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? > check last updated date? > For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok2-svn, but amarok2-svn was > last updated in beginning of Jun, amarok-svn yesterday. > > Manne Are

[arch-general] AUR package version

2009-07-03 Thread Manne Merak
Hi, how do I know which AUR package to use if there are multiples? check last updated date? For example, there is amarok-svn and amarok2-svn, but amarok2-svn was last updated in beginning of Jun, amarok-svn yesterday. Manne