On Saturday 07 Jan 2012 16:07:44 Andreas wrote:
Does someone know if cronie does support running missed jobs
automatically (asynchronous job processing)?
I think that's why Cronie ships with Anacron. The latter is supposed to deal
with those cases, I think. It's largely the split
Am Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:45:48 +
schrieb Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 07 Jan 2012 16:07:44 Andreas wrote:
Does someone know if cronie does support running missed jobs
automatically (asynchronous job processing)?
I think that's why Cronie ships with Anacron. The
On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 10:29:01 Heiko Baums wrote:
fcron runs missed jobs if bootrun is set at the beginning of the
line in fcrontab. fcron has cron and anacron features all in one and
works perfectly.
I've heard quite a few good things about fcron. Am I right in thinking it has
some slightly
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 10:29:01 Heiko Baums wrote:
fcron runs missed jobs if bootrun is set at the beginning of the
line in fcrontab. fcron has cron and anacron features all in one and
works perfectly.
I've heard
Am Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:31:55 +
schrieb Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com:
On Sunday 08 Jan 2012 10:29:01 Heiko Baums wrote:
fcron runs missed jobs if bootrun is set at the beginning of the
line in fcrontab. fcron has cron and anacron features all in one and
works perfectly.
I've
Am Sun, 8 Jan 2012 10:45:15 +0100
schrieb SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com:
I'm also using fcron for years (even back when cron was still the
default in arch), it is perfect, and first of all very stable. It fits
desktop usage very well.
And it fits server usage just as well.
Heiko
Am Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:29:12 +0530
schrieb gt codere...@gmail.com:
I am using dcron, and am quite satisfied with it. Can you elaborate
why you recommend fcron, i might switch.
Usually I wouldn't say something like RTFM, but since I don't want to
start such a long discussion about this topic
On Saturday 07 Jan 2012 11:49:48 éæè¾ wrote:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron? Cronie in base group
seems has a separate anacrontab in /etc which is not kiss I think? If
anacron functionity has been included in dcron by default, May be dron
is a good choice?
I would
2012/1/7 Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com:
On Saturday 07 Jan 2012 11:49:48 郑文辉 wrote:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron? Cronie in base group
seems has a separate anacrontab in /etc which is not kiss I think? If
anacron functionity has been included in dcron by default,
Recently, I noticed that my laptop and server are using different cron
utility.My laptop is using dcron while server using cronie.
Then,I did some digging about the Arch default cron utility.I found a
[discussion](http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2011-April/019282.html)
happend
Am Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:49:48 +0800
schrieb 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezh...@gmail.com:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron?
I would still recommend fcron.
Heiko
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 05:50:06 +0100
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I would still recommend fcron.
+1
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As the ignorant perform their duties with attachment to results,
the learned may similarly act, but without attachment, for the
sake of leading people on the
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:50:06AM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:49:48 +0800
schrieb 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezh...@gmail.com:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron?
I would still recommend fcron.
I am using dcron, and am quite satisfied with it. Can you
13 matches
Mail list logo
