On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:13:23 +0900
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2013-07-21 18:56:28 -0400] Leonid Isaev:
> > Is there a particular reason why the images themselves are signed
> > as opposed to only their checksum files? For instance, Fedora provides
> > sha256sums with inline sigs [1], and verifyi
[2013-07-21 18:56:28 -0400] Leonid Isaev:
> Is there a particular reason why the images themselves are signed as
> opposed to only their checksum files? For instance, Fedora provides
> sha256sums with inline sigs [1], and verifying image checksum + checksum file
> signature is _much_ less CPU
Hi,
One of the ways to verify an archlinux iso image is via its gpg
signature. However, doing this on an atom/geode system with < 1GiB of RAM is
definitely not fun. And I suppose it also takes noticeable time to sign, even
on an opteron/xeon server.
Is there a particular reason why
3 matches
Mail list logo