On 05/18/2010 03:47 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote:
Excerpts from Linas's message of Tue, 18 May 2010 22:31 +0200:
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no
longer work in Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I
messed up? To wit:
On 05/18/2010 03:58 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Sergey Manucharian
ingeniw...@gmail.com wrote:
Excerpts from Linas's message of Tue, 18 May 2010 22:31 +0200:
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no
longer
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 01:41 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
So the bottom line is don't alias 'ls'. And, I guess, the next
question would
be, how or where can I safely customize the behavior of ls without
screwing
myself again.
Solution is simple: don't use ls for the for loops you're doing.
On 05/18/2010 03:23 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 16:17, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer
work in
Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
In
On 05/19/2010 01:48 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 01:41 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
So the bottom line is don't alias 'ls'. And, I guess, the next
question would
be, how or where can I safely customize the behavior of ls without
screwing
myself again.
Solution is
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is the case, replace ls with /bin/ls in the above and try again
or if your REALLY lazy like me :)
\ls
the \ runs the real ls, not the aliased version. However, Aaron's
way will always work, and is
you can also use env ls which I believe gets ls from the PATH
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer work
in
Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
15:10 nirvana:~/dt/compiz/compizX11 l
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 6 david david 4096 May 18 15:04 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 david dcr 4096 May 18 15:04 ..
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 16:17, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer
work in
Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
In short, you're doing it wrong.
On Tue, 18 May 2010 22:17:48 +0200, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
15:10 nirvana:~/dt/compiz/compizX11 l
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 6 david david 4096 May 18 15:04 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 david dcr 4096 May 18 15:04 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 david david 4096 May 18 15:03 i586
drwxr-xr-x 2
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer work
in
Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
What could keep the simple cli from working on Arch? I know this stuff
worked
before updates this
Excerpts from Linas's message of Tue, 18 May 2010 22:31 +0200:
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no
longer work in Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I
messed up? To wit:
What could keep the simple cli from
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Sergey Manucharian
ingeniw...@gmail.com wrote:
Excerpts from Linas's message of Tue, 18 May 2010 22:31 +0200:
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no
longer work in Arch. Same cli works fine in suse.
you may want to try
for i in $(`which ls` -d .) ; do `which ls` $(`which pwd`)/$i; done
it does work here
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ...
Xorg.conf(5)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Aaron
Using ls for something like this is never a good idea, as Daenyth's link
repeatedly points out. Use bash's globbing to get the job done.
for i in *; do
foo $i
done
Also unlike ls, this won't fail because of aliases or white spaces, either.
It just works(tm).
d
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:40
15 matches
Mail list logo
