Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-24 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 7:01 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I repeated the rm/rsync again and while the size reported is the exact > correct number of bytes, the checksum is again wrong: > > 2832de308651f77df753b5a5977431c0 archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso > > Is there anything other than hardware

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-21 Thread Marcel Kleinfeller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi David, there are many factors that may cause a bad download. If memtest does not fail try some more things. 1. Plug a usb stick or an external drive into your laptop and "cd" into it. Try to run rsync from there and tell me if md5sum failes aga

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-20 Thread Drake Wilson
David C. Rankin wrote: > Is there anything other than hardware that could account for this? The > drive in the laptop is [etc.] Bad RAM is a common source of data corruption along those lines. Try booting a memtest disc? ---> Drake Wilson

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-20 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/19/2015 04:32 PM, Marcel Kleinfeller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [marcel@oompf ~]$ md5sum archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Everything should be fine with this mirror. Marcel, All, I am now t

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-19 Thread Marcel Kleinfeller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [marcel@oompf ~]$ md5sum archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Everything should be fine with this mirror. Am 19. Februar 2015 22:54:45 MEZ, schrieb "David C. Rankin" : >On 02/19/2015 0

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-19 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/19/2015 03:00 PM, Jesse B. Rodriguez wrote: On Feb 19, 2015 1:51 PM, "David C. Rankin" wrote: All, http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Actual download reports: 31fa61afd67cbd88

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-19 Thread Jesse B. Rodriguez
On Feb 19, 2015 1:51 PM, "David C. Rankin" wrote: > > All, > > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: > > 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso > > Actual download reports: > > 31fa61afd67cbd88c91f97d7d04244a1 archlinux-2015.02.01-d

[arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-19 Thread David C. Rankin
All, http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Actual download reports: 31fa61afd67cbd88c91f97d7d04244a1 archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Will try download again, but can anyone confirm correct m