On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:41:41 Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 16/03/10 00:48, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > [...]
> > But as far as file system performance goes, the overhead should be
> > identical for both the runs, no?
>
> I'm not too sure about that. I'm guessing there is less seeking going on
>
On 16/03/10 00:48, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
[...]
But as far as file system performance goes, the overhead should be identical
for both the runs, no?
I'm not too sure about that. I'm guessing there is less seeking going on
with Btrfs. Some files systems (reiserfs + reiserfs4 IIRC) are very go
On Monday 15 March 2010 15:44:35 Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 13/03/10 03:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.
> >
> > Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt
>
> Maybe you're looking for http://docs.python.org/library/f
On 13/03/10 03:05, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.
Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt
Maybe you're looking for http://docs.python.org/library/filecmp.html
One cannot help but think that you took a disk-bound process an
On 03/13/2010 08:35 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.
Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt
Great. A stable version released ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
Hi,
Just wanted to share an interesting experience I had today.
Check http://ghodechhap.net/btrfs.performance.txt
--
Regards
Shridhar
6 matches
Mail list logo
