hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:45:46 -0400
Ryan Sims wrote:
2009/4/9 Allan McRae :
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
jack-audio-connection-kit, qjackctl and ardour, all in
extra, have been out of date...
So, does anyone have working updated PKGBUILDs for thes
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:45:46 -0400
Ryan Sims wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Allan McRae :
> > hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> >>
> >> jack-audio-connection-kit, qjackctl and ardour, all in
> >> extra, have been out of date...
> >>
> >
> > So, does anyone have working updated PKGBUILDs for these that I can
> > push
2009/4/9 Allan McRae :
> hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>>
>> jack-audio-connection-kit, qjackctl and ardour, all in
>> extra, have been out of date...
>>
>
> So, does anyone have working updated PKGBUILDs for these that I can push to
> [extra]?
>
> Allan
This one for ardour2 from AUR works fine on my
hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
jack-audio-connection-kit, qjackctl and ardour, all in
extra, have been out of date...
So, does anyone have working updated PKGBUILDs for these that I can push
to [extra]?
Allan
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
2009/4/6 :
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:37:14 +0200
Ondřej Kučera wrote:
Hi,
Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and
the system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> 2009/4/6 :
>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:37:14 +0200
>> Ondřej Kučera wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and
>>> the system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package out of
>>> date
Excerpts from hollunder's message of Di Apr 07 13:35:20 +0200 2009:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:41:00 +0200
> ludovic coues wrote:
>
> > I suppose that some maintainer are not looking as often as some
> > people from the arch's
> > community want to there package.
> >
> > Couldn't be multiple maint
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:41:00 +0200
ludovic coues wrote:
> I suppose that some maintainer are not looking as often as some
> people from the arch's
> community want to there package.
>
> Couldn't be multiple maintainer for package ?
Some of us (archaudio people) wished that was possible in AUR a
I suppose that some maintainer are not looking as often as some people from
the arch's
community want to there package.
Couldn't be multiple maintainer for package ?
2009/4/6 :
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:37:14 +0200
> Ondřej Kučera wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and
>> the system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package out of
>> date to get dev's/TU's attention" works fine. But sometimes there
>>
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:37:14 +0200
Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and
> the system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package out of
> date to get dev's/TU's attention" works fine. But sometimes there
> exist packages both in
Hi,
Arch's packages usually (almost always) get updated pretty fast and the
system "don't create a bug report, just flag the package out of date to
get dev's/TU's attention" works fine. But sometimes there exist packages
both in community and in extra (I'm not sure about core but maybe even
t
12 matches
Mail list logo
