Guillermo Leira wrote:
> I'm not a programmer, so I can't submit code, but it would be nice if
> pacman would say "Installed as a dependency of: package-name", or
> something similar. It's just a suggestion.
If a package is removed without its dependencies, those dependencies
also lose the pointe
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> I'm not a programmer, so I can't submit code, but it would be nice if
> pacman would say "Installed as a dependency of: package-name", or
> something similar. It's just a suggestion.
Indeed: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7224 and in so
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> Hummm... I'm seeing some pacman -R options that can be very useful to keep
> the system clean. Maybe I should have used it, and now I wouldn't have
> these "orphan" packages in my disk.
Yup, I think this is reason.
After running 'pacman -R
-Original Message-
From: Karol Blazewicz
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:02:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Deleting packages
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Guillermo Leira
> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've seen th
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've seen that I've lots of packages that I seem to no longer need. Would it
> be safe to run
>
> Pacman -R $(pacman -Qtdq)
>
> Regards,
>
> Guillermo Leira
Short answer: yes, pacman will ask you if you really want to remove
thes
Hello!
I've seen that I've lots of packages that I seem to no longer need. Would it
be safe to run
Pacman -R $(pacman -Qtdq)
Regards,
Guillermo Leira
6 matches
Mail list logo