On 8 May 2011 02:43, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
now i understand the question. It won't be removed. I did it for ffmpeg
because it has a big warning after ./configure
License: nonfree and unredistributable
How are we keeping FAAC/FAAD2 in [extra] then? If we redistribute
FAAC/FAAD2
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
--- PKGBUILD 2011-05-07 11:29:11 UTC (rev 122937)
+++ PKGBUILD 2011-05-07 11:51:04 UTC (rev 122938)
@@ -5,26 +5,28 @@
-depends=('bzip2' 'lame' 'sdl'
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
--- PKGBUILD2011-05-07 11:29:11 UTC (rev 122937)
+++ PKGBUILD2011-05-07 11:51:04 UTC (rev 122938)
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
--- PKGBUILD2011-05-07 11:29:11 UTC (rev
On 07-05-2011 17:05, Loui Chang wrote:
Or the distro could purchase or otherwise aquire licenses to all claimed
patents... ha... ha...
... and then you fall out of bed and wake up. Either that or someone
with very very very deep pockets needs to finance that.
I agree that all this
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Is faac support in ffmpeg causing trouble to other applications
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:18 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Is faac support in ffmpeg causing trouble to other applications or was
changed for
On Sat 07 May 2011 11:24 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
a bit of a divergence ... but as i think about next-gen packaging
quite a bit i've often considered if a most advanced distribution
system would negate issues like this ... for example, what if a
nonfree package _knew_ it was nonfree,
Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2011-05-07 18:24:38 +0200:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios
On Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:26:54 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2011-05-07 18:24:38 +0200:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de
wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32
On 05/07/2011 12:32 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
--- PKGBUILD2011-05-07 11:29:11 UTC (rev 122937)
+++
On 05/07/2011 08:41 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
On 05/07/2011 12:32 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
---
On 8 May 2011 02:07, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 05/07/2011 08:41 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
On 05/07/2011 12:32 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
On 05/07/2011 09:21 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote:
Will be also unlinked from mplayer?
mplayer doesn't use system ffmpg
The question was aimed at the fact thatt mplayer too has faac as depends...
As an opinion: I'd rather not want to recompile mplayer every time
there's an update, been there
On 05/07/2011 09:21 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote:
On 8 May 2011 02:07, Ionut Biruib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 05/07/2011 08:41 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
On 05/07/2011 12:32 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff,
On 05/07/2011 03:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 09:21 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote:
Will be also unlinked from mplayer?
mplayer doesn't use system ffmpg
The question was aimed at the fact thatt mplayer too has faac as
depends...
As an opinion: I'd rather not want to recompile
On 05/07/2011 11:17 AM, Mauro Santos wrote:
On 07-05-2011 17:05, Loui Chang wrote:
Or the distro could purchase or otherwise aquire licenses to all claimed
patents... ha... ha...
... and then you fall out of bed and wake up. Either that or someone
with very very very deep pockets needs to
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
drop nonfree stuff, fix headers
Modified: PKGBUILD
===
--- PKGBUILD 2011-05-07
On 05/07/2011 12:33 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
and most Linux users don't give a damn if something is
nonfree.
That's precisely part of the problem. You are walking blindly into
patent traps and the destruction of a mutually beneficial community just
for the sake of convenience.
Have fun with
Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/07/2011 06:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
Is faac support in ffmpeg causing trouble to other applications or was
changed for licensing reasons?
licensing. if you need faac you should use abs to
21 matches
Mail list logo
