On 11/20/12 08:48, Daniel Micay wrote:
[snip]
The issues with a separate /usr were internal gentoo ones. Their
initramfs tool is not yet capable of mounting it,
Wrong.
And the actual problem are the users that do not want an initramfs -
things booted without one the last few decades, why add
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
And the actual problem are the users that do not want an initramfs -
things booted without one the last few decades, why add some machinery
now that doesn't improve anything? (I mean, we could boot before, so
what's the
Am 20.11.2012 01:07, schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
Odd, my take was that the main goal was trying to bring back a
separate /usr.
They believe that the problem is that udev refuses to work with /usr not
mounted. They also believe the problem to be solved by just removing
the test. They do not even
Am 20.11.2012 12:00, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 20.11.2012 01:07, schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
Odd, my take was that the main goal was trying to bring back a
separate /usr.
They believe that the problem is that udev refuses to work with /usr not
mounted. They also believe
I started replying, and then the post got way too long and I stopped. As
you simply ignored most of what I said, I'll just quote most of this for
reference and not reply to it (it is a funny read, after all). It is
really pointless to keep arguing, because you won't see reason anyway
(and frankly,
I want to bring to your attention that Gentoo is working on a udev fork
called eudev that will
- respect the Unix philosophy
- be POSIX-compliant and get rid of glibcisms
- have no unnecessary dependencies (systemd, kmod)
- support separate /usr
I normally wouldn't respond to trolls on this list and really I'd rather
have seen this post be moderated straight to where it belongs -- /dev/null.
However
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jérôme Bartand moije...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to bring to your attention that Gentoo is working on
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:31:40 +0100
Jérôme Bartand moije...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to bring to your attention that Gentoo is working on a udev fork
called eudev that will
- respect the Unix philosophy
- be POSIX-compliant and get rid of glibcisms
- have no unnecessary dependencies
On 11/19/2012 09:31 PM, Jérôme Bartand wrote:
I want to bring to your attention that Gentoo is working on a udev fork
called eudev that will
- respect the Unix philosophy
- be POSIX-compliant and get rid of glibcisms
- have no unnecessary dependencies (systemd, kmod)
- support separate
[2012-11-19 16:30:10 -0500] Dave Reisner:
I normally wouldn't respond to trolls on this list and really I'd rather
have seen this post be moderated straight to where it belongs -- /dev/null.
And you'd normally be right. I've let this message through because it's
short, borderline troll but
[2012-11-19 15:37:06 -0600] Leonid Isaev:
This has already been discussed on the forums, in the General Linux section:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=153063. Please, keep the
eudev-related issues there and do not pollute this ML, as I don't want to
see 300 emails in my mailbox
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Jérôme Bartand moije...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to bring to your attention that Gentoo is working on a udev fork
called eudev
Having read through their discussions, it seems that the main two
things they would like to change is to be able to build udev without
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:54:31 +0100
Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Having read through their discussions, it seems that the main two
things they would like to change is to be able to build udev without
building systemd (this does of course not change the resulting code,
but saves time if
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Odd, my take was that the main goal was trying to bring back a
separate /usr.
There is nothing to be done in udev for this (just have a look in the
eudev git repo; there are no commits fixing separate /usr), so that
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:54:31 +0100
Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Having read through their discussions, it seems that the main two
things they would like to change is to be able to build udev without
building
15 matches
Mail list logo
