Am 13.05.19 um 13:53 schrieb Justin Capella via arch-general:
...
> I recognize base64
> but
> RWSUBDizLm/GKcGyJf84aGAXKuZLjXNJrUezGuLaqd89R+rQmlFz/L42V8xe78eOx7kyXAJ3rPF30MUQpBayUSkof3KQxE35CA0=
> in the sig file associated with liblzf... But it's useless to me without
> the extraneous tool I'm
I am unable to locate PKGBUILDs for the packages mentioned, php-redis and
liblzf. I've looked on the site you mentioned, Archlinux's packages, and in
AUR. Am I missing something? Do you maintain Archlinux packages for these?
Or is it that David is perhaps trying to make PKGBUILD and asking that
On 05/12, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Actually, from the reference you provide, this seems to be exactly _not_
> the case. I'm certainly no expert in arch packaging, but it looks as if
> the arch package needs to explicitly add any gnupg signature files to the
> source array, otherwise they wouldn't be
Hi,
consider to read this thread,
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-user/2019-February/111637.html.
The community not only off-list second that I have not done anything
wrong, they also second that by mails to the mailing list. However, for
no reason he banned me from more than
For clarity,
On 05/11, Marc Lehmann via arch-general wrote:
> He replied that the arch build system automatically treats all .sig files
> as gpg signatures, and that this can't be switched off; that the signature
> for http://dist.schmorp.de/liblzf/liblzf-3.6.tar.gz does not verify, and
> claimed
(Please (also) reply personally to me if you want me to read a reply, as I
don't monitor the list).
Hi!
I was recently harassed by David Runge , by e-mail.
I don't know if this is the right place to report this, but I looked
at the wiki and the code of conduct, and this seemed the most fitting
6 matches
Mail list logo
