On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:00:12AM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> > >> Second, my own experience lead me to disable [haskell] repository
> > >> on my computers because some packages were out of date but where
> > >> picked before AUR ones
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >> Second, my own experience lead me to disable [haskell] repository
> >> on my computers because some packages were out of date but where
> >> picked before AUR ones by the aur helper I use.
> >
> > Hence the confusion around this issue.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:40PM -0800, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> 2011/12/20 Cédric Girard
>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Ethan Schoonover
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Always avoid AUR Haskell packages (they are mostly out of date)
>>
>> I'm not sure about this. First I find this unrespectful to
2011/12/20 Cédric Girard
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Ethan Schoonover >wrote:
>
> > 2. Always avoid AUR Haskell packages (they are mostly out of date)
>
> I'm not sure about this. First I find this unrespectful to the people
> spending time maintaining Haskell PKGBUILDs in the AUR (and I'
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Ethan Schoonover
wrote:
> 2. Always avoid AUR Haskell packages (they are mostly out of date)
I'm not sure about this. First I find this unrespectful to the people
spending time maintaining Haskell PKGBUILDs in the AUR (and I'm not saying
this before I do).
Secon
So is the current best practice for Haskell on Arch something like this:
0. Always prefer to source Haskell packages from official Arch repos
now that they are updated
1. Always add the [haskell] repo to pacman.conf
2. Always avoid AUR Haskell packages (they are mostly out of date)
3. Always avoid
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
[...]
> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated
> today.
When building xmonad-extras against these updated packages I noticed
that you didn't include a version compiled with profiling enabled
(maybe not su
Just try to support Haskell Platform in extra/community. That's enough.
Magnus Therning [2011.12.18 1148 +0100]:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
>
> Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
> considering adding xmonad-ext
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:53:29AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 18/12/11 11:48, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
> >
> > Excellent, then
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
[...]
> What are the real troubling haskell packages? Only GHC,
> haskell-platform and XMonad?
I'm not sure any of them are troubling. This is my view on it:
- GHC is a big package, but Vesa is doing a good job keeping it
up-to
On 18/12/11 11:48, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
>
> Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
> considering adding xmonad-extra
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
[...]
>
> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
considering adding xmonad-extras too, or should I go ahead and add
that to [haskell]
On 18/12/11 09:53, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
>> There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR
>> Haskell packages:
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html
>>
>> As an end user, I effectively ignore the
On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR
> Haskell packages:
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html
>
> As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell
> packages as they are so f
There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR
Haskell packages:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html
As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell
packages as they are so far out of date. I'm also now trying to
disregard most o
On 12/17/2011 11:41 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Haskell platform was released with the latest stable GHC (7.0.4 of course).
>
> Guys, what's happening with haskell support in Arch?
>
> Xmonad, and now GHC and lots of packages in the supported repos are
> not keeping update with upstream.
i vote
Haskell platform was released with the latest stable GHC (7.0.4 of course).
Guys, what's happening with haskell support in Arch?
Xmonad, and now GHC and lots of packages in the supported repos are
not keeping update with upstream.
18 matches
Mail list logo
