>> 3) instead of LOCALIZATION section I should specify timezone in
>> /etc/timezone and /etc/localtime. And again the same question. Why?
>
> /etc/timezone is not used by initscripts, don't know what the benefit of
> that one is. What matters is /etc/localtime.
>From https://wiki.archlinux.org/ind
Am 25.07.2012 21:22, schrieb brainwor...@lavabit.com:
> Hello, folks
>
> Due to recent changes in arch linux, I have some qustion about new process
> of installation and configuration of arch linux.
>
> I am really not computer geek, so I apologize if I express anything
> incorrectly.
>
> First. Ab
Welcome ;)
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
brainwor...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Hello, folks
>
> Due to recent changes in arch linux, I have some qustion about new process
> of installation and configuration of arch linux.
>
> I am really not computer geek, so I apologize if I express anyt
Hi, I'm in a hurry to work so I will try to be the most clear but succint
possible,
forgive any typo then :)
"[...]So if I do not have installation
guide previously printed on paper, I just become consused what to do
next.[...]
But for the present I would like at least to have installation guide
i
On 07/25/2012 01:49 PM, brainwor...@lavabit.com wrote:
>>> And now the main question. If new plan of reorganization of
>>> configuration
>>> files can not manage without rc.conf, why there is so need to split it?
>>
>> rc.conf should now only contain what is necessary to configure the
>> initscript
W dniu 25.07.2012 21:49, brainwor...@lavabit.com pisze:
And now the main question. If new plan of reorganization of
configuration
files can not manage without rc.conf, why there is so need to split it?
rc.conf should now only contain what is necessary to configure the
initscripts. See arch-dev-
>> And now the main question. If new plan of reorganization of
>> configuration
>> files can not manage without rc.conf, why there is so need to split it?
>
> rc.conf should now only contain what is necessary to configure the
> initscripts. See arch-dev-public for details.
>
So systemd is instead o
On Jul 25, 2012 9:22 PM, wrote:
>
> Hello, folks
>
> Due to recent changes in arch linux, I have some qustion about new process
> of installation and configuration of arch linux.
>
> I am really not computer geek, so I apologize if I express anything
> incorrectly.
>
> First. About absence of core
Hello, folks
Due to recent changes in arch linux, I have some qustion about new process
of installation and configuration of arch linux.
I am really not computer geek, so I apologize if I express anything
incorrectly.
First. About absence of core images. When I just read about it, I thought
why
9 matches
Mail list logo
