Re: [arch-general] LibreOffice changes: dependencies, 'Fresh' branch & misguiding package names

2014-06-22 Thread Neitsab
On 2014-06-22 13:25, Doug Newgard wrote: > On 2014-06-22 12:08, Neitsab wrote: >> What confuses me is that it seems current Arch-provided >> libreoffice-common is already built from upstream "Fresh" branch, as >> package version 4.2.5 matches the one announced upstream (release >> announcement [3]

Re: [arch-general] LibreOffice changes: dependencies, 'Fresh' branch & misguiding package names

2014-06-22 Thread Doug Newgard
On 2014-06-22 12:08, Neitsab wrote: What confuses me is that it seems current Arch-provided libreoffice-common is already built from upstream "Fresh" branch, as package version 4.2.5 matches the one announced upstream (release announcement [3] and current Arch PKGBUILD for libreoffice-common [4])

[arch-general] LibreOffice changes: dependencies, 'Fresh' branch & misguiding package names

2014-06-22 Thread Neitsab
Hi everybody, During a recent system upgrade I noticed I had a couple of new orphaned packages, among which libcdr, libetonyek, libmspub, libodfgen, libvisio and libwps. A quick investigation directed me to the libreoffice-common package, which has ceased relying upon them in its 4.2.4-2 version.