On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500, Aaron Griffin
aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas linas...@ymail.com
No Objections from my side
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400
Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:53:04 -0400
Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to
the wiki.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas linas...@ymail.com wrote:
I assume this ask to have GFDL CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
GFDL 1.3 gateway
expired on August 1, 2009.
I really need an answer on this as soon as
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas linas...@ymail.com wrote:
I assume this ask to have GFDL CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
wiki. The existing content can only be relicensed by its authors. The
GFDL 1.3
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.uk
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:19:09 +0200
Linas linas...@ymail.com wrote:
I assume this ask to have GFDL CC-BY-SA content coexist at the
wiki. The
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the
wiki.
If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding
*additional* content under CC. But switching all *existing* content to
On Wed 30 Jun 2010 00:15 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:56:39 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I was also waiting for someone more knowledgeable with regards to the
wiki.
If it's my say-so you want, I don't see a problem with adding
*additional*
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too controversial a
choice, as in CC
On Thu 17 Jun 2010 21:42 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
content under a CC licenses? I
Ananda Samaddar wrote:
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:17:38 -0400
Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 17 Jun 2010 21:42 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution
license which is incompatible
13 matches
Mail list logo
