Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
thread. Regards, Ralf [1] Begin forwarded off-list message: Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:52:00 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: Subject: Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs [snip] Just running $ sudo abs works and provides what is wanted in the context of the thread. You could install it

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 04/07/2017 04:21 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:07:12 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >> You don't appear to follow arch-dev-public [0] very closely, do you. > > This was mentioned a few days back on this mailing list, too. > What's your point? > >> https://lists.a

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 04/07/2017 03:35 AM, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Just that asp is from AUR which isn't an official repository. ABS is in >> the official Extra repository, >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System . > > > Except

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:21:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:07:12 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >>You don't appear to follow arch-dev-public [0] very closely, do you. > >This was mentioned a few days back on this mailing list, too. >What's your point? > >>https://l

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:07:12 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >You don't appear to follow arch-dev-public [0] very closely, do you. This was mentioned a few days back on this mailing list, too. What's your point? >https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2017-March/028752.h

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
You don't appear to follow arch-dev-public [0] very closely, do you. cheers! mar77i [0] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2017-March/028752.html

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:35:08 +0200, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: >It's somewhat a chicken and egg question. So it's not a problem, a chicken already exists, you could release it by official repositories. Remember, on Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:16:20 +0200, Neven Sajko wrote: >And you can use asp h

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Just that asp is from AUR which isn't an official repository. ABS is in > the official Extra repository, > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System . Except the reason for that is that arch doesn't need to distribute that softwa

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 06:16:20 +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: >And you can use asp https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asp-git/ for >downloading the official repo buildscripts. Just that asp is from AUR which isn't an official repository. ABS is in the official Extra repository, https://wi

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Mader
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 14:45:19 CEST Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: > Also, I forgot to add some literature on the subject, too. [0], [1], [2] > > cheers! > mar77i > > [0] https://linux.die.net/man/8/ld-linux > [1] http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/6463/print > [2] http://tldp.org/HOW

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
On 7 April 2017 at 06:07, Neven Sajko wrote: > GCC 6 builds Archlinux. It's in the base-devel group btw, along with other packages generally required for building: https://www.archlinux.org/groups/x86_64/base-devel/ Also, you might want to read the makepkg page on wiki.archlinux.org. And you ca

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
GCC 6 builds Archlinux.

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky via arch-general
On 6 April 2017 at 14:13, Wolfgang Mader wrote: > If this compiler is a c++ one, it does its specific name mangling. Thus, > linking against these libs should only be possible for binaries compiled with > the same c++ compiler. However, arch ships gcc6, gcc5, and clang. Does it also > ship librari

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
Also, I forgot to add some literature on the subject, too. [0], [1], [2] cheers! mar77i [0] https://linux.die.net/man/8/ld-linux [1] http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/6463/print [2] http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Wolfgang Mader wrote: > Arch ships with a lot of libraries of which .a and .so are stored in /usr/lib > and beyond. These libraries are compiled by some compiler, the compiler by > which the entire arch linux distribution packages are compiled with. By the > way, wh

[arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Wolfgang Mader
Hi all, I have a general question about linking in C++ with which you can probably clarify for me. Arch ships with a lot of libraries of which .a and .so are stored in /usr/lib and beyond. These libraries are compiled by some compiler, the compiler by which the entire arch linux distribution p