> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
There's also Moziila Raindrop
https://mozillalabs.com/raindrop/2009/10/22/introducing-raindrop/
--
damj
vlad (2009-11-18 18:47):
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:56:59AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > > Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> > >> mail reader. Might be worth lo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:56:59AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> > Daenyth Blank wrote:
> >>
> >> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> >> mail reader. Might be worth looking into
> >>
> >> http://keithp.co
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>>
>> I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
>> mail reader. Might be worth looking into
>>
>> http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
>
> well its really "not much". i wouldnt consider this a m
Daenyth Blank wrote:
I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
mail reader. Might be worth looking into
http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
well its really "not much". i wouldnt consider this a mua. its more a
search engine for muas. a pretty decent one though. mayb
http://notmuchmail.org/
Le Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:23:25 -0600,
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
> Aha, so this is the same as the "threaded vs nested comments" when it
> comes to web page commenting. As far as I know, that's a holy war no
> one will ever win.
Strange that you like Gmail-style but the comments on your own blog are
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 11:07:08 and regarding:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
> thanks
>
I've used about all of them from plain
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Antony Jepson wrote:
>> On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
>>> In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
>>> here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
>>> thread branch.
>>
>>
Alessandro Doro wrote:
Patch the Makefile (you don't need to run ./configure) then make.
--- Makefile2009-11-17 21:36:47.0 +0100
+++ ../Makefile 2009-11-17 21:36:03.0 +0100
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
hey that compiled. thanks. i didn't realize it has a makefile despite
failed confi
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/17/2009 07:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
you could try thunderbird. thunderbird
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>
> >I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> >mail reader. Might be worth looking into
> >
> >http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
>
> looks very promising. thanks for sharing. coul
On 11/17/2009 07:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
you could try thunderbird. thunderbird 3 which is now beta
Daenyth Blank wrote:
I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
mail reader. Might be worth looking into
http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
looks very promising. thanks for sharing. couldnt compile it, but maybe
someone less lazy them me can educate that dude that t
Antony Jepson wrote:
On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
thread branch.
I definitely prefer the proper threading available in Mutt. I often find
myself na
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 20:23:25 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Aha, so this is the same as the "threaded vs nested comments" when it
> comes to web page commenting. As far as I know, that's a holy war no
> one will ever win.
>
Well, in Kmail I can set it to keep my replies on the folder as well as t
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:46:15 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
> newsletters and such). i just hoped it was more configurable
> (e.g. per-account keybindings so i could have single-key keybindings
> to delete mails when i'm in my news
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:01:31 -0800
Myles Green wrote:
> I've been using Claws-Mail [1] since forever and have been happily
> using it with Gmail as well as my ISP account.
>
> [1] http://claws-mail.org/
claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
newsletters and such). i j
On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
> here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
> thread branch.
I definitely prefer the proper threading available in Mutt. I often find
myself navigating through my
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> On 11/17/09 at 01:13pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
>> >> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
>> >
I thought he was talking about how gmail only has one level for
each conversation and some MUA have more
gmail keeps a list of mails and other ones create a tree of mails
branching at each reply that doesn't follow the data sequencing
or something like that...
--
Guilherme M. Nogueira
"Any suff
On 11/17/09 at 01:13pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
> >> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
> >> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
> >>
>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
>> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
>> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
>>
>
> Would you mind to explain what is addicting you?
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:11:12 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Xavier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani
> > wrote:
> >> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> >> i've trie
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
>
Would you mind to explain what is addicting you?
I specially *dislike* the way gmail puts all the replies at the same le
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:07, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
> thanks
>
I just saw a link on reddit this morning
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
>> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
>> unusable slow.
>>
>> Can somone recommend another M
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
Lately I realized I have become way too addicted
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:20:06 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thank
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
emacs/gnus
emacs/wanderlust
?
humm.. i didn't know emac
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
emacs/gnus
emacs/wanderlust
?
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 22:37:08 Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
kmail. Using for last 5+ years with no real com
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
33 matches
Mail list logo
