On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Guus Snijders wrote:
>
> There are sometimes quite interesting details mentioned in the OT threads.
> A -discuss list would be a good place for those, without cluttering
> -general.
> (yes, i'm being an optimist here ;-).
>
> Opening dev-public would take some serio
Op 30 sep. 2012 06:37 schreef "Nicholas MIller" het
volgende:
>
> On Sep 29, 2012 10:26 PM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ...sometimes I want to contact the
> > > devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
> >
> > Ther
On Sep 29, 2012 10:26 PM, "Oon-Ee Ng" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ...sometimes I want to contact the
> > devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
>
> There's a bug tracker where you can directly contact maintainers, for
> bugs/feature
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:53 AM, <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...sometimes I want to contact the
> devs to bring something up or ask a question on it.
There's a bug tracker where you can directly contact maintainers, for
bugs/feature requests. For 'questions' I'd think that's not really the
res
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 02:16:23AM +0800, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> > The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> > > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollut
[2012-09-28 12:01:01 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> > with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incompetence.
On 28 Sep 2012 11:34, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
> An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to
> rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from
the
> outside.
>
I concur this idea, but who's is going to moderate it? You should consider
that als
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, "Nicolas Sebrecht" wrote:
>>
>> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>>
>> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
>> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute
On Sep 28, 2012 12:01 PM, "Nicolas Sebrecht" wrote:
>
> The 28/09/12, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
> > We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
> > posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollute threads
> > with fear, uncertainty, doubt, and just sheer incom
[2012-09-28 11:38:13 +0200] Nicolas Sebrecht:
> What you're calling crap are all technical content that could gain with
> direct emulation with official maintainers.
We have recently seen on this very mailing list that for every person
posting considerate opinions, there are dozens who just pollut
On 28/09/12 19:38, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> BTW, what a wonderfull attitude from you to non official people. Highly
> contructive and motivating. Thanks.
Thanks.
On 28/09/12 19:01, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/09/12, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>
>> Can you give some examples of discussions you would see moving to
>> archlinux-dev?
>
> Sure.
>
> Subject: [arch-general] Modifying archiso
> From: Robbie Smith
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:11 +1000
On 09/27/2012 11:34 AM, Tobias Frilling wrote:
The -discussion mailing list could serve as an outlet for this need,
rendering the other list more productive via being moderated; The rule
wouldn't be "shut up or be banned", which shouldn't really be
necessary for rational folks like us, but "shu
Very eloquently put brethren "+1"
On Sep 27, 2012 9:33 PM, "Martín Cigorraga" wrote:
> While I would like to support @Tobias idea of splitting the list I also
> agree with all the following emails.
> Btw, so much time using Arch and I've never heard about
> http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux, than
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:32:08PM -0300, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> We Arch Linux users are a kind of users who:
> [1 ... 6]
A as user I can subscribe to this 100%, also to your conclusions.
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on
While I would like to support @Tobias idea of splitting the list I also
agree with all the following emails.
Btw, so much time using Arch and I've never heard about
http://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux, thanks for that.
I only want to add an observation to what was already said:
Tipically all this fl
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:28:02 +0100
> mike cloaked wrote:
>
>> For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
>
> Is there an alternative way to access the forums? mailing list, usenet?
You can subscribe to threads and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 09:44 PM, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> I can only see two things that can really help slow down/stop/revert the
> spiral:
>
> 1) Moderation. Get rid of the serial trollers/flamers
> 2) Get more devs and "good" people to join and be active.
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:28:02 +0100
mike cloaked wrote:
> For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
Is there an alternative way to access the forums? mailing list, usenet?
--
Joakim
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:19:31 +0200
Tobias Frilling wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/27/2012 12:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> > And we are back...
>
> Sir, you've got some yarbles.
> IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too,
> well, general.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
>
> As it was mentioned a couple times on the list, the forums have
> moderators. If you don't behave, you get banned, threads get closed
> etc.
OK - it seems to work - when I get frustrated with the mailling list I
go to the forums instead
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:28 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> For those users who use the arch forums via a web interface there
> seems to be more helpful comments and less trolling than in the
> general list - just an observation - maybe that is because the forums
> are split into a number of topic spec
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
>
>> IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well,
>> general.
>
> The problem is not that arch-general is the wrong place for the latter
> threads. Users are correct to think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 04:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> Instead of fragmenting more the mailing lists with the hope of putting
> poor contributions out of place for advanced users, let enter the
> technical oriented users into the dev mailing list.
I don't t
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 27/09/12, Tobias Frilling wrote:
>
> The problem is not at the general mailing list but at the dev mailing
> list side.
archlinux-dev is for contributors and as long somebody is just a user
he should have read-only access. Unless we h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Full ack, although I have the feeling that critical discussion is
something what (at least some) devs/admins want to avoid within the
community.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tobias Frilling
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/27/2012 12:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> And we are back...
>
> Sir, you've got some yarbles.
> IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well,
> general.
> Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 12:43 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> And we are back...
Sir, you've got some yarbles.
IMHO the cause of all these flaming is that arch-general is too, well, general.
What about if we would split this list up into a list for technical questions
On 26/09/12 21:35, Allan McRae wrote:
> I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
>
> This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
> sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
>
> Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who
> sends an email th
I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars...
This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages
sent to the list will go to /dev/null.
Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who
sends an email that is not asking for help or providing help.
Allan
30 matches
Mail list logo
