On Nov 30, 2007 11:47 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't rocket surgery.
We need an engine transplant, STAT!
Holy crap people... this got way out of hand. We're discussing a footer.
a footer
This isn't rocket surgery. We either have it, or we don't. I turned it
off on this list as a trial.
Frankly, I like it simply because it's 4 less lines I have to remove
when editing quotes. I do like the archive li
On Friday 30 November 2007, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
> list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
I may wanna know who the sender trully is, right? I agree that is many times
not important but... it *can* be important.
Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
> list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
That's indeed a good point.
But all my emails get signed by default. And I think, that's not bad.
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://bl
Am Freitag, 30. November 2007 15:21:11 schrieb bardo:
> I think that by "intrusive" people meant "breaking gpg signatures". If
> that's the case, I'm with them.
I don't know why people sing their emails when sending to a public mailing
list. Who checks all the keys and imports them?
--
archlinu
2007/11/30, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I see it is a matter of taste so my opinion may be different than
> you. But if a 4 word footer is intrusive, then maybe signatures should
> be disallowed as well. No one really needs to know what company X works
> for or what his/her GNU/Linux
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 14:45 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> > A simple "ArchLinux General Mailing List" footer looks professional
>
> Does it need to look professional? Or do we only need the list to be
> functional?
>
> > and is non intr
On Friday 30 November 2007, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> A simple "ArchLinux General Mailing List" footer looks professional
Does it need to look professional? Or do we only need the list to be
functional?
> and is non intrusive.
Well, I disagree. Many people have pointed it to be intrusive too ;)
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 08:28 -0500, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way
On Nov 30, 2007 8:20 AM, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > It will look more elegant that way.
> > Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> > :-)
>
> And
On Nov 30, 2007 6:41 PM, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It will look more elegant that way.
> Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
> :-)
And something flash based! how can you forget flash???
--
Vinay S Shastry
http://v
Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It will look more elegant that way.
Let's use html-email with fancy logos and background images.
:-)
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 14:37 +0200, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> I would prefer keeping at least one line
>
> Greg
Yes, please keep at least one line that indicates the mailing list. It
will look more elegant that way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I would prefer keeping at least one line
Greg
pgpNWPcnNUrUf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Nov 30, 2007 7:09 AM, Marc Deop i Argemí <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
> > Anyone want to yell about it?
>
> Great!
>
+1!
No more deleting footers for me! :-)
--
Cheers,
On Friday 30 November 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
> Anyone want to yell about it?
Great!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
"R. Dale Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, sure looks much better that way.
*thumbs up*
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
http://cryptocd.eduforge.org/online_version
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Ok... well - how about this - I shut it off, as a trial, on this list.
Anyone want to yell about it?
Well, sure looks much better that way.
On Nov 29, 2007 7:36 PM, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WE HATE YOU! -+ :)
> |
> V
>
>
> ___
> arch-general mailing list
> arch-general@archlinux.org
On Thu 2007-11-29 21:36 , slubman wrote:
> Le Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:49 +0100,
> Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
> > GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and
> > attachments and
On Thursday 29 November 2007, slubman wrote:
> I want the footer to stay, cause it add a rapid link/way to go to the
> html archive of the list.
Man! Set a bookmark in your browser! ;)
Anyway...what's the point of the footer? Anybody knows? If it's useless...we
should get rid of it.
Damnshock
On Nov 29, 2007 2:36 PM, slubman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want the footer to stay, cause it add a rapid link/way to go to the
> html archive of the list.
I personally agree, but trimming it down 2 lines or so might be doable
___
arch-general maili
Le Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:49 +0100,
Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
> GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and
> attachments and attaches this to an new email.
> Mail programm notices
"Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious.
GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and attachments and
attaches this to an new email.
Mail programm notices that and shows the attached mail as original mail.
Thinking about it - the footer would b
On Nov 28, 2007 3:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petar Bogdanovic schrieb:
> > Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
> > subject line? It seems pretty useless to me since there are a lot of
> > other headers on which a filter can be based on. The same
Am Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:33:36 +0200
schrieb Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i would vote for getting rid of the footer as well if thats an option.
> or at least shorten it a bit. its irritating when people quote & quote
> without removing it.
But that's not a problem of the footer.
That's
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer?
> > > It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.
2007/11/29, Jeff Mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer?
> > It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.
>
> +74
>
> I hate the footer.
>
+1337! :P
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман К
On Nov 28, 2007 4:37 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The prefix in the subject is fine, but can we please drop the footer?
> It's annoying and breaks GPG/MIME.
+74
I hate the footer.
// codemac
--
. : [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] : .
___
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Yeah, just keep in mind that to filter these lists you need to filter
> on the To address, not the From.
> These mails are "To: arch-general@archlinux.org", not from the list.
> They are From the poster.
Filtering by ListId is generally the most accurate, I've found. Most
Petar Bogdanovic schrieb:
> Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
> subject line? It seems pretty useless to me since there are a lot of
> other headers on which a filter can be based on. The same goes for the
> automatic signature. One gets the following headers:
The p
> On Nov 27, 2007 6:52 PM, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2007 5:32 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > -1 from me. I filter all Arch mailing lists I subscribe to into
> > > one folder. This way I can see where the message came from what
> > > I can repl
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Cesar G. Miguel wrote:
> > Actually, i would like to keep that because gmail filters only works by
> > subject if I'm not wrong.
>
> Gmail can also filter by e-mail address! That's how I use it.
>
> Cesar
I must correct myself and say that gmail *can* filter my listi
On Nov 27, 2007 6:52 PM, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 5:32 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -1 from me. I filter all Arch mailing lists I subscribe to into one
> > folder. This way I can see where the message came from what I can reply to.
>
> I second
> Actually, i would like to keep that because gmail filters only works by
> subject if I'm not wrong.
Gmail can also filter by e-mail address! That's how I use it.
Cesar
___
arch-general mailing list
arch-general@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mail
On Nov 27, 2007 5:32 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 from me. I filter all Arch mailing lists I subscribe to into one
> folder. This way I can see where the message came from what I can reply to.
I second that! I filter all linux mailing lists into one folder and
like that it sho
Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:35:18PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> The main mailing list has been renamed, from "arch" to "arch-general",
>>
>
> Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
> subject line? It seems pretty useless to me since t
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
> Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
> subject line?
Actually, i would like to keep that because gmail filters only works by
subject if I'm not wrong.
Damnshock
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:35:18PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> The main mailing list has been renamed, from "arch" to "arch-general",
Would it be possible to remove the [arch-general] prefix from the
subject line? It seems pretty useless to me since there are a lot of
other headers on which a
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Sorry for all of you that have to update your mail filter rules, but
> it's better this way - I promise 8)
You got me there! I recieved dozens of mail on my inbox :P
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hey guys,
You may have noticed a new address up there in the From line (unless
you got this via the announce list)
The main mailing list has been renamed, from "arch" to "arch-general",
and additionally "tur-users" has been renamed to "aur-general".
The reason? The naming was unclear, especially
41 matches
Mail list logo
