Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-02-01 Thread James Rayner
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:36 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:37:54AM +1100, James Rayner wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > > > > > You should try the testi

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-31 Thread fons
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:37:54AM +1100, James Rayner wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > > > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead: > > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread James Rayner
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead: > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/any/netcfg-2.5.0rc2-1-any.pkg.tar.gz > > Will this allow to

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread fons
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead: > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/testing/os/any/netcfg-2.5.0rc2-1-any.pkg.tar.gz Will this allow to specify additional routes (apart from GATEWAY) as well ? It's one thing

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-30 Thread Jim Pryor
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:23:25PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Thanks, it does seem to work (just one try so far). I've seen the netcfg > testing thread in the forums, is that the authoritative place to go for > info on this latest version, since the wiki doesn't seem updated for it > yet (which of c

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-29 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:00 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 29.01.2010 02:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-29 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 29.01.2010 02:42, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee: > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP key are correctly set. It > exist with a 'could not obtain IP addr

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-29 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:36 -0500, Alexander Lam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > > to my home's wifi network. ESSI

Re: [arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-29 Thread Alexander Lam
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. > > When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect > to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP key are correctly set. It > exist with a 'could not obta

[arch-general] Netcfg after resume from suspend

2010-01-28 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
Hi all, I'm using netcfg and recently have been noticing the following. When I resume from suspend I call 'netcfg home' which tries to connect to my home's wifi network. ESSID and WEP key are correctly set. It exist with a 'could not obtain IP address error, this is the dmesg:- Registered led dev