[arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-16 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:21 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 15:55 +, Mauro Santos wrote: > > On 16-01-2012 15:14, Ralf Madorf wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 14:55 +0200, Thanasis Georgiou wrote: > > > > > >> On 16 January 2012 14:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > >>> [snip]

Re: [arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-15 Thread Don Juan
On 01/15/2012 12:12 PM, Ralf Madorf wrote: On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 14:53 -0500, Rob wrote: On 01/15/2012 07:04 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote: "Note that software rendering does require sufficient CPU power for a good experience." SSE2 is very resource hungry, so at least for audio usage GNOME is lost. I

Re: [arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-15 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 14:53 -0500, Rob wrote: > On 01/15/2012 07:04 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote: > > > > "Note that software rendering does require sufficient CPU power for a > > good experience." SSE2 is very resource hungry, so at least for audio > > usage GNOME is lost. I don't like the work flow when

Re: [arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-15 Thread Rob
On 01/15/2012 07:04 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote: "Note that software rendering does require sufficient CPU power for a good experience." SSE2 is very resource hungry, so at least for audio usage GNOME is lost. I don't like the work flow when using GNOME3, but I'll install it again and test it, since X

[arch-general] OT: xf86-video-nv question

2012-01-15 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 12:28 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > 2012/1/15 Ralf Madorf : > > [snip] > > It's good that Arch Linux still provide the nv driver, at least Debian > > dropped it, but it's known that nouveau doesn't work for many users, > > that there at least is the need to offend the GPL to