Well I think you're to dramatic now :) No one is going to kill something
that is rock solid and dynamic distro, the only ones that will manage to do
so is those who don't care about it at all. I mean you don't get the point
here. I'm creating an wiki article(Snapshot_Release), hopping to explain my
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
> goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
> I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
> person
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:55:12 +0100
Kristoffer Fossgård wrote:
> I think this already exists to some extent.
>
> It's called "new cd/dvd installer image", that is, whenever the Arch
> team releases a new installer, which is supposed to be every month
> now?
what? every month? are you crazy :)
>Hi,
>
>I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday
>that goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on
>the forum, I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken
>packages. I personally think Arch is stable and well maintained
>compared to oth
Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages.
what broken packages? if archlinux provides vani
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Grigorios Bouzakis schrieb:
>>
>> Hi, it has been discussed many times in the past. Bottom line is, if
>> you want to do that go ahead, the developers wont help you. Meaning
>> this will not be an official project.
>
> It's true that there w
Thomas Bächler :
> That said, from my and many users' experience, Arch is very stable
> despite constantly changing. We have managed to walk the fine line
> between bleeding edge and stability/usability, and I think we have been
> doing pretty well.
And that's one of the big facts why I _love_ A
Thank you for your clarification, and I do not mean to create "beasts of
burden" out of you guys :)
Kind regards,
Ali
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
> > Well, I didn't intend to upset you guys :) But such is his
I agree with you completely. I'm not saying that Arch is unstable or stable,
but rather talking about rolling release concept in snapshot release. It's
good to know that there are people to seek help for this kind of project. I
mean if I was a developer, I certainly would be doing stuff than writin
Grigorios Bouzakis schrieb:
Hi, it has been discussed many times in the past. Bottom line is, if
you want to do that go ahead, the developers wont help you. Meaning
this will not be an official project.
It's true that there won't be an official project, but it doesn't mean
there won't be any h
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Ali H. Caliskan
wrote:
> Well, I didn't intend to upset you guys :) But such is history, it appears
> to have happened bofore and it certainly will happen again. I'm not saying
> that I need this, but it certainly would benefit the Arch community. I'm not
> a devel
thanks for the wiki link, it's good to know that some has tried to implement
the ideas, which I didn't know existed at all.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been using Arch since few mont
I'm sick of this Debian comparison, I'm infakt a former debian user for 8
years, so I know that it's not all abou this.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
> I have found Arch very stable even with a rolling release system though I
> don't run KDE or Gnome. One cause of issues
Well, I didn't intend to upset you guys :) But such is history, it appears
to have happened bofore and it certainly will happen again. I'm not saying
that I need this, but it certainly would benefit the Arch community. I'm not
a developer, so I'll have difficulties applying what you're saying thoug
I have found Arch very stable even with a rolling release system though I
don't run KDE or Gnome. One cause of issues seen often in the forums is
problems caused by *not* running pacman -Syu on a regular basis. I run it
daily. I like Arch the way it is. It's nice to read about some issue
affecting
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
>> goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
>> I've encou
Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintain
Hi,
I believe that having system still-up-to-date is one of the basic ideas of
Arch. If you want to have snapshot just waint until your system is "stable
enough" and then don't do pacman -Syu for some time :-)
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 23:19:07 Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Ar
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ali H. Caliskan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
> goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
> I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
> perso
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintained compared to other big
Hi,
I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintained compared to other big
21 matches
Mail list logo
