On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 07:50, schrieb Myra Nelson:
>> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
>>
>> According to < $: man pacman >
>>
>> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
>> date.
Am 29.06.2012 07:50, schrieb Myra Nelson:
> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
>
> According to < $: man pacman >
>
> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
> date. See Sync Options below. When upgrading, pacman performs versio
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> pacman sees 1.5000 as being newer than 1.51 as 5000 > 51. So that
> warning is correct, because only perl package versioning thinks that
> 5000 < 51 ...
>
I suggest you to have a look at this thread as well:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pip
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
>> to 1.51.
>
> In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.
>
> --
> Florian Pritz
>
>
>
Florian:
Thanks for the tip.
Myra
--
Lif
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 29/06/12 02:58, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to
>>> be updated.
>>>
>>> According to < $:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/06/12 16:01, martin kalcher wrote:
>> Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
"Ignoring upgrade from perl-datetime-format-strptime from 1.51-1
to 1.5000-1"
No complain
On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
> to 1.51.
In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29/06/12 16:01, martin kalcher wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> "Ignoring upgrade from perl-datetime-format-strptime from 1.51-1
>>> to 1.5000-1"
>>>
>>> No complaints as it's easy to fix, I was just wondering about the
>>> rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/06/12 02:58, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to
>> be updated.
>>
>> According to < $: man pacman >
>>
>> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all pack
Am 29.06.2012 07:58, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
According to < $: man pacman >
You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
date. See Sync Options below. When upgr
On 29/06/12 15:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
>
> According to < $: man pacman >
>
> You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
> date. See Sync Options below. When upgrading, pacman performs version
>
I have a question about pacman's behaviour regarding packges to be updated.
According to < $: man pacman >
You can also use pacman -Su to upgrade all packages that are out of
date. See Sync Options below. When upgrading, pacman performs version
comparison to determine which packages need upgradin
12 matches
Mail list logo
