Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:43 +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911 :)

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:29 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > > Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have > > you > > tried the -q options? > > No I didn't. > > # pacman -Syup > > at the moment only will remove

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote: > # pacman -Syup > > at the moment only will remove the unwanted output. Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have you > tried the -q options? No I didn't. # pacman -Syup at the moment only will remove the unwanted output. Thank you, Ralf

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:16 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > > 2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf : > > > Hi :) > > > > > > I wonder if warnings like > > > > > > # pacman -Syu > > > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community > > > (0.5.

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > 2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf : > > Hi :) > > > > I wonder if warnings like > > > > # pacman -Syu > > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community > > (0.5.3-1) > > warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-prev

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100 Ralf Madorf wrote: > Hi :) > > I wonder if warnings like > > # pacman -Syu > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community > (0.5.3-1) > warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview > (20090920-1) > > are useful? Once

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Stefan Wilkens
2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf : > Hi :) > > I wonder if warnings like > > # pacman -Syu > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community > (0.5.3-1) > warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview > (20090920-1) > > are useful? Once there will be more packages, it wil

Re: [arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ralf Madorf wrote: > I wonder if warnings like > are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become > uncomfortable to read more important output. This is nothing new, pacman 3 had these too. You should read the whole output anyway because there's no te

[arch-general] Pacman v4.0.1-4 could be less verbose

2012-01-25 Thread Ralf Madorf
Hi :) I wonder if warnings like # pacman -Syu warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community (0.5.3-1) warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview (20090920-1) are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become uncomfortable to read more importa