The 28/08/12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> This is the point. If a daemon has been customized for systemd (which
> some have, and hopefully more will), then it will expect systemd to
> set up its communication channels for it and pass them to the daemon
> on startup, it might also expect systemd to do m
The 28/08/12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> I guess what I wrote was a bit misleading. Ignore socket/dbus
> activation (that is a side effect only). The point is that I don't see
> how to make daemons of Type=simple (the default), Type=dbus or
> Type=notify work without reimplementing much of systemd (re
The 27/08/12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> As has been mentioned, the problems I foresee are (ordered from
> "currently a problem" to "a potential problem a long time from now":
>
> 1) not enough people testing initscripts. This would be easy to help
> out with :-)
> 2) third-party software (such as gn
3 matches
Mail list logo
