Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Timothée Ravier wrote: > * pam:rebuild '--enable-selinux' flag for Linux-PAM, patch for > pam_unix2, which only removes a function already > implemented in a library elsewhere. Is there an > upstream here? I couldn'

Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

2013/11/3 Timothée Ravier > Hi, > > I've updated all the SELinux related packages in the AUR. I've changed > most packages names to better fit with upstream names and AUR naming > policy (selinux-pam -> pam-selinux; selinux-usr-libselinux -> > libselinux). I'll keep the old ones a week or two, ju

Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

On 03/11/2013 21:32, Timothée Ravier wrote: > Status of core packages that requires patches or rebuild: > > * findutils: need SELinux patch, can be upstreamed, but is upstream > still alive ? > * pam:rebuild '--enable-selinux' flag for Linux-PAM, patch for > pa

Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

Hi, On 03/11/2013 23:50, Karol Babioch wrote: > Looks great. As soon as I have some spare time I will give it a try. Thanks! If you're building by hand, have a look at the quick README here: https://github.com/Siosm/siosm-selinux/blob/master/README.md >> I'll setup an other repository for the SE

Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

Hi, Am 03.11.2013 21:32, schrieb Timothée Ravier: > I've updated all the SELinux related packages in the AUR. Looks great. As soon as I have some spare time I will give it a try. > I'll setup an other repository for the SELinux policy as soon as I have > something which can boot in enforcing mod

[arch-general] SELinux packages status update

Hi, I've updated all the SELinux related packages in the AUR. I've changed most packages names to better fit with upstream names and AUR naming policy (selinux-pam -> pam-selinux; selinux-usr-libselinux -> libselinux). I'll keep the old ones a week or two, just in case, then I'll ask for deletion.