> Some users have suggested we use donation money to get a new computer
> for one of the developers - while I would not object to a shiny new
> computer, I am unsure if this would justify the use of our donations.
If you have a modern system already. You may only actually need a new
motherboard or
Am 10.12.2012 17:21, schrieb kristof:
>> Could you refer to any documentation about this? Why would the boot
>> loader need to call back into shim?
>
> I'm going off of my correspondence with Matthew Garrett in the comments
> section of a post he wrote concerning the shim. His reply to me when I
>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:26:58 -0800, kristof wrote:
Oh, and some UEFI implementations don't actually allow users to add keys
to the database; only remove them. The workaround to this is to delete
all keys in the database, which would cause the computer to boot into
"setup-mode", where a use
Oh, and some UEFI implementations don't actually allow users to add keys
to the database; only remove them. The workaround to this is to delete all
keys in the database, which would cause the computer to boot into
"setup-mode", where a user could manually start repopulating the key
database
First, I'd like to apologize for sending a very lengthy reply that wasn't
attached to this thread. I didn't realize that just because a thread's
five days old doesn't mean you can't reply to it.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:28:23 -0800, Thomas Bächler
wrote:
Am 10.12.2012 06:54, schrieb krist
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> But Thomas is right: this has to be implemented and tested by those who
> own such hardware; which at this time we don't.
Seems like a perfect opportunity to spend some hard-earned donation money on a
test rig, no?
Greetings,
Den
Am 05.12.2012 10:36, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> We don't understand what to do here at all. That's why we the developer
> who will be packaging these things needs access to such a machine
> himself. I'd really have fun figuring this out, but I currently don't
> want to spend money on a new computer.
Am 05.12.2012 00:57, schrieb kristof:
> I actually just bought a new laptop with secure boot capable UEFI, and
> if a generous developer could just release an iso with both the shim and
> grub-efi installed, then I (and the other Christoph) would gladly try it
> on our own machines.
Use archiso to
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:41:58 -0800, Christoph Vigano
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04.12.2012 10:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
If any Arch developer were to magically receive a new, secure-boot
secured computer, then we could quickly get shim support.
Well, I'm no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04.12.2012 10:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> If any Arch developer were to magically receive a new, secure-boot
> secured computer, then we could quickly get shim support.
>
Well, I'm not an Arch developer, but as it happens I got myself a
Thinkpa
Am 04.12.2012 02:51, schrieb kristof:
> Now that Matthew Garrett's shim is fully featured and publicly
> available, will Arch be implementing support for secure boot in the near
> future?
There is one showstopper to this: To my knowledge, not a single Arch
developer or trusted user has a machine t
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:51 PM, kristof wrote:
Thanks for these insightful read, I will look forward those article.
Now that Matthew Garrett's shim is fully featured and publicly available,
will Arch be implementing support for secure boot in the near future?
For those who haven't seen the news yet:
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/17542.html and
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20303.html give a pretty in-depth d
13 matches
Mail list logo
